THE POLL TAX
Anarchist Communist Editions (ACE) Pamphlet No. 4
Anarchist Communist Federation
(now Anarchist Federation www.afed.org.uk)
First published in March 1990 under the Tories
(following 'The Poll Tax and How to Fight It' October 1988)
Now published online March 2006 and dedicated to New Labour and the Left
“Our past experience should teach us to expect nothing else of them.”
‘As a socialist, I have no time for tax-dodgers’
head of Lothian region Labour council’s Finance Department
‘Such is the scale of the non-payment movement
in our region that we may have to write-off
large sums of outsanding poll tax’
Beating the Poll Tax
How not to fight
What lies behind the Poll Tax
The ‘Left’ and the Poll Tax
Appendix: What is the Poll Tax?
Burning poll tax
registration forms in
is now a reality in
As the first poll
tax demands are sent out in
This pamphlet sets out to show how that battle can be won – by uncompromising, united working class resistance: in the communities where we live, and the places we work.
It argues that those struggles must be controlled directly by those engaged in them – outside the control of the Labour Party, local councils, the party-building left or any other set of would-be bosses.
Together we can crush the ‘community charge’.
BEATING THE POLL TAX
COUNCILS ACROSS THE
country are in crisis over the poll tax. Hundreds of thousands of Scottish
people are still refusing point-blank to pay a penny of their first poll tax
demand -nearly ten months after the bills were sent out. Hundreds of
thousands more are set to join the non-payment campaign in
The chaos that
surrounded attempts to compile ‘registration lists’ of those liable to pay in
Scotland, has been repeated in England and Wales with organised disruption of
the process threatening to push the system to collapse. Worried council
officials are warning that they may not even be ready to send out the first
The efforts of Scottish councils to beat the non-payment movement by taking money direct from people’s bank accounts, or by seizing goods from their homes to sell are failing dismally.
Communities have mobilised to protect each other and see off the bailiffs. Workers in dole offices and council finance departments have threatened strike action if they’re ordered to deduct unpaid poll tax direct from Claimants’ giros or council workers’ wage-packets.
Despite all the pressure from the government, and media black-out, despite all the attempts at sabotage by Labour leaders, and the endless claims of the ‘impossibility of building a mass campaign of non—payment of the poll tax - an enormous number of working class people in Scotland are united in just such a movement.
And all the gloomy predictions that the non-payment campaign would collapse once the first bills were received, have been shown up as defeatist drivel, out of step with the mood of anger and defiance that exists in working class communities Scotland-wide.
It’s not just the case that the non-payment movement is ‘holding firm’. As more and more people have realised the state most Scottish councils are in, and their inability to chase up those not paying, many who paid a ‘first instalment’ on their poll tax bill, have re-joined the non-payment movement - swelling the numbers of those involved.
It’s a movement that’s not about to collapse or fizzle out. The same Labour authorities who claimed that non-payment was a non-starter now accept that.
Council’s own estimates admit that they will be faced with a minimum of 120,000
non-payers in the city this year. They’re so certain that a mass campaign of
defiance will emerge, that they’re busily building special poll tax court buildings
in readiness to prosecute those not paying. Lothian Labour Council, in
Other figures are hard to come by - after doing their own sums, most councils are keen to keep quiet about their estimates of the strength of the non-payment campaign they will face.
Even the opponents of the non-payment campaign those very same local authorities who said it would never get off the ground now admit that they face a long, drawn-out and bitter battle against large numbers of working class people.
The coming weeks
will be crucial in the battle against the poll tax in
At the end of last year, around 400,000 final demands to settle the whole of the first year’s poll tax within 14 days (or face the consequences) were sent out. Strathclyde region sent out an additional 300,000 7-day final demands to those people in arrears in its area. When - at end of the week - over 80% of these ‘final’ demands had been totally ignored, exasperated council officials conceded that the response had been ‘disappointing’.
People have realised that - with the council administrative machinery still in chaos - them ‘threatening’ to seriously take on the non-payment campaign is nothing but a joke.
The idea that the same councils who even now don’t know exactly how many people aren’t paying because their systems aren’t yet sorted out enough to count them properly could take hundreds of -thousands of people to court; wage or benefit ‘arrestments’; or issue thousands of bailiffs warrants, is just plain laughable.
Lothian council still can’t work out where 20,000 rebate applications from people not registered to pay have come from.
Councils have been trying two alternatives to simply trying to frighten people into paying.
One is to trace
people’s bank accounts, and seize overdue poll tax direct from there. The
other, is to send in the bailiffs to first ‘poind’ (value) and then seize ‘nonessential’
household goods from non-payers to auction off to pay their debts. Either of
these tactics are slow, complicated, costly and time-consuming - and that’s if
they work at all. The experiences councils are suffering in
· The heads of Scottish clearing banks announced in late-November that they simply wouldn’t be able to cope with thousands of council requests to seek out the bank account details of non-payers. Even if they could it would cost a fortune and take forever - and they couldn’t guarantee to find even 5-6% of the names.
· Bailiffs raids on the homes of working class people have proved so unpopular - and have been met with such fierce community resistance - that many councils are already considering abandoning them altogether. Groups of bailiffs, backed by police protection, have been met by angry crowds hundreds strong when they’ve ventured onto Scottish housing estates. Time and again councils have been forced to drop the action.
And the fact is that the non-payment campaign is beginning to hit councils hard. Figures released in late November show that in Lothian region alone, the council is £25.5 million short in poll tax receipts. It’s having to borrow money to make up the shortfall.
The latest blow to poll tax bosses came in December when officers from the Data Protection Agency ruled that over two hundred councils had asked ‘illegal’ questions on their registration forms. They’ve been ordered to go through each and every one of their computer files to erase the wrongly-held information - as if they didn’t have enough problems already.
Now, poll tax Minister John Patten has announced plans to ‘cap’ any local authority who ‘overspends’ government-imposed limits. But they’d be unable to impose ‘caps’ on council budgets until weeks after the first bills had been dispatched. The result would be that councils would have to ‘cancel’ all the bills they’d sent and issue a whole new set in their place. They’d have to issue refunds; work out rebates from scratch; re—adjust ‘installment’ payments and more. warning of the utter chaos this would cause, the Association of Metropolitan Authorities has concluded that the government ‘does not live in the real world. Councils couldn’t change their entire taxation policy in days’.
Of course, the key to bringing down the poll tax lies in independent collective working class action, against all branches of the State. Despite the claims by the head of the Scottish Rating and Valuation Association, Ron Skinner that: ‘you don’t need policies to stop the community charge. It will stop itself’, we don’t believe for a minute that councils’ poll tax plans will collapse of their own accord. But we’d be stupid to overlook weaknesses in our enemies.
everywhere are in a mess and well-behind schedule. In
And what better time to go on the offensive than when our opponents are weak and disorganised?
Pleading with our enemies?
There’s still a lot of people arguing that we should look to the leaders of local councils to head the fight against the poll tax and persuade them not to ‘implement it’. They’ve complained of the ‘cowardice’ of our Labour leaders in not putting their weight behind the fight, and argued that without their support, our struggle is doomed to defeat.
But the reason those council and Labour leaders have tried to wreck the fight has nothing to do with a lack of ‘bravery’ or ‘guts’. They haven’t ‘sold us out’ because they were never on our side to begin with. The leaders of the Labour Party and local councils have repeatedly attacked the anti-poll tax struggle, because their position and their interests dictate that they must.
Despite the insistence from some that ‘left wing’ councils could. be won over to agree not to implement the poll tax, not a single local authority has considered doing so. Without exception, every struggle so far fought against the poll tax, and every element of the non-payment campaign has been built in the face of total opposition from our municipal ‘socialist’ administrations.
Pleading with council bureaucrats is a more than a futile waste of time: it’s actually counter-productive. It encourages illusions that councillors can be ‘won’ to our side, and that the power to smash the poll tax rests with them.
Taking the fight against the poll tax inside the council means building links with the only group of people really capable of putting a spanner in the works of the councils’ implementation machine: council workers.
Organising against poll tax-driven council cuts means organising against the council. Those councillors who stay in office and implement the poll tax have made their decision about where they stand and we should treat them accordingly. When Manchester council workers called on the city’s ‘anti-poll tax’ Labour council not to implement the community charge, council leader Graham Stringer explained that to do so would mean Labour having no influence on the decisions taken.
He couldn’t have put it more clearly: if hanging onto power means enacting the most vicious series of attacks on the living standards of ordinary working class people - it’s a price that Labour councillors are more than willing to pay.
Our past experience should teach us to expect nothing else of them.
Tories in trouble:
From the beginning, the general unpopularity of the poll tax has caused splits in the Tories ranks. Recently those splits have become damaging public slanging matches.
Sitting Tory MPs in marginal constituencies fear that high poll tax levels could spell electoral disaster. Conservative MP Michael Mates vocalised the fears of many fellow Tories, when he said: ‘When it first set sail, the Titanic was described as the flagship of the fleet. None of us wants that piece of history to repeat itself’.
Resentment towards the poll tax from traditional Tory supporters, has forced the government to repeatedly amend the legislation, to try to limit the impact it will have on Tory-run boroughs. Plans to fund ‘transitional poll tax relief’ for inner city areas from the coffers of well-off Conservative councils, had to be dropped when angry Tory-loyalists complained of its ‘unfairness’. Conservative councillors have been further angered by government threats to ‘poll tax cap’ Tory boroughs whose spending exceeds official limits.
The best way to exploit the growing divisions and demoralisation in the Tory party over the poll tax, is by increasing the strength and militancy of our revolt against it.
The battle in
deadline for the completion of poll tax registration in
The complexity of the ‘community charge’ legislation and the tightness of the timetable local authorities are having to work to - all work to our advantage.
Taking inspiration from the successes of the Scottish campaign, anti-poll tax groups springing up throughout the country organised widescale disruption of registration. With the government learning from getting their fingers burnt in Scotland, the most effective tactic in delaying registration, has become simply ignoring the forms for as long as possible.
are hard to find, but recently, over 30% of residents of the Tottenham area of
Community and workplace struggle:
The strength of organised resistance to the poll tax is – currently - rooted in the community-end of the campaign.
It is the
non-payment campaign that has provided the focus for working class poll tax
The spread of community-based organisation has not - so far - been matched by a similar level of workplace and industrial activity.
The most significant impact workers have made on the introduction of the poll tax to date, was during the selective strike action by local government workers over their national pay claim last year. Many council poll tax offices were brought to a total standstill during the stoppages. But the disruption caused by this key group of workers remained incidental to their pay battle.
Poll tax preparations were threatened not because workers employed to organise poll tax were angry enough to strike against it, but because - in pursuit of their pay claim - they’d withdrawn their labour to pressurise councils into increasing their wages.
Some anti-poll tax groups visited picket lines to offer support and argue the case for sabotaging poll tax collection from within. But, although many good direct contacts were made, once the pay claim had been settled, strikers returned to work, and the poll tax machinery was activated again.
The urgent need, then and now, is to turn that incidental disruption into active, conscious solidarity. Low-paid council workers have no interest in implementing poll tax - they can no more afford massive poll tax bills than any other working class people. And the destruction of council services that the po1i tax brings with it, threatens their - and other council workers - jobs directly.
group of local government workers in
Workers in London dole offices recently struck in protest at management plans to get them to pass details of claimants and their dependents from DSS records straight to poll tax officials. Other offices voted to join the action if the snooper-forms were imposed on them.
In January, a clear majority of the 17,000 workers employed by Leicester Council voted in favour of industrial action if the council issues a single redundancy notice because of poll tax—inspired service cuts. They realise all too well how Leicester council’s plans to slash budgets in the coming months, threaten their jobs and services - and they’re right to organise themselves now, before the council has even announced which sectors face the axe, so they can prepare properly to resists the attacks, and show the council they mean business.
It’s clear that workers wanting to take action against the poll tax will come into immediate conflict with their unions. Local government union NALGO may have an ‘anti-poll tax’ position on-paper, but the reality is that - like all other union bureaucracies - they will seek to contain and limit workers anger, trying to prevent effective action breaking out beneath them.
Union officials faced with council demands for massive job cuts, won’t fight them wholesale, but will rush in to ‘negotiate ~away’ those jobs as ‘fairly as possible’ and ‘help the council out of a tight spot’ as ‘painlessly’ as they can. Workers’ immediate interests are in defending their jobs and wages and in protecting the services that other working class people use and need. The interests of the union are in protecting their position in the pecking order, and their ‘right’ to be ‘consulted’ by the bosses.
Just as community mobilisations against the poll tax need to organise outside arid against the Labour Party mandarins in the town hail, workers - whether directly involved in poll tax work or not - will need to organise outside and against the union bureaucracy.
Most crucially of all, they need to link community and workplace struggle together - not through the mediation of ‘left-wing’ councillors or ‘progressive’ union bureaucrats -but directly, to co-ordinate and unify their struggles.
The poll tax can be beaten. But it can only be defeated by militant autonomous action by working class people outside the control of all unions, parties or leaders. The Tories ‘flagship’ is in deep trouble - the right sort of action could sink it once and for all.
HOW NOT TO FIGHT
‘When we send in the bailiffs against people
refusing to pay their poll tax,
we will do so with tact and care’
Mick Johnson, leader of
Scottish Labour councillors led a march in
neglected to point out that the councils responsible for such ‘immoral’ and
‘inhuman’ attacks on the working class were in almost every case in
Those same Labour councillors who joined him in denouncing warrant sales, were the very people responsible for sending the bailiffs out in the first place.
Nothing could better illustrate the role that the leaders of the Labour Party and trade union movement have played in the struggle against the poll tax, or better show the contempt in which they hold ordinary working class people.
For, despite all their claims to be an ‘anti-poll tax party’, from the earliest days of the anti-poll tax campaign the true agenda of the Labour Party and their allies in the trade union bureaucracy has been clear.
Far from defeating the poll tax, their real objectives have been to try to crush any effective opposition to it, and try to ensure that any anger that was mobilised, wasn’t directed at Labour controlled local authorities and councils, but focused in a purely ‘anti-Tory direction’.
Their attacks on the anti-poll tax struggle have been relentless - they’re tried to sabotage resistance again and again. But their wrecking tactics have failed.
From the beginning, the Labour Party’s twin strategy of trying to disguise its total compliance with the poll tax, and spike all effective opposition to it, has been ruthlessly pursued.
The first battle they waged against the emerging poll tax struggle, was to predict its ‘certain defeat’.
As early as January 1988, Labour leader Neil Kinnock warned a conference in Edinburgh, that even to consider building a mass campaign of poll tax non-payment was ‘a fruitless council of despair’. He called on those working class families faced with finding money for massive poll tax bills they simply could not afford to ‘do nothing and wait’ for a certain Labour victory in the next election.
His pleadings met with a contemptuous response. As anger against the poll grew and became more vocal, the Labour Party and the Scottish TUC decided that they needed to be seen to be doing more to ‘oppose’ the hated ‘community charge’.
So while Labour
controlled authorities throughout
The whole thing was a sick joke. For while Labour bureaucrats organised token symbolic ‘opposition’ to the compiling of the lists, their party colleagues in local town halls prepared to despatch snoopers to working class estates, and threaten with fines those who wouldn’t sign up.
Many Labour authorities paid for purpose-built new office space to house their poll tax operations - hoping that by separating it from other council work, people might somehow not realise what the council was up to. Birmingham Labour council named its new poll tax office ‘Margaret Thatcher House’.
desperate attempts to disguise its backing for poll tax, were fuelled by fears
of the consequences of working class families in
But the ‘Stop-It’ campaign failed dismally to stem the growing tide of organised resistance to the poll tax, and worried Labour leaders were forced to change their tactics.
After trying to
divert growing industrial unrest over the poll tax into an 11-minute stoppage -
and with the imminent arrival of the poll tax in
Just a few days before the first bills were sent out, Campbell Christie - addressing a hostile and angry crowd at an anti-poll tax demonstration - declared: ‘I am not having any clowns challenging my credibility over this issue’ and promptly tore up his payment book, announcing he would now support ‘a three month period of non—payment’.
Christie’s last-ditch effort to re-assert control over the movement was met with derision and laughter. Poll tax law allows a maximum three-month period in which to pay up - Christie’s intervention was the equivalent of announcing that you aren’t going to be paying your gas bill until you got the red one.
The thousands committed to ignoring bills they couldn’t - or wouldn’t – pay and who’d been repeatedly attacked and denounced by Christie and his cronies, were now being told they had his backing for a 12-week refusal campaign - at the end of which they should pay up and give in.
Long after Christie’s 12-week deadline had passed, the first official figures were released of those refusing to pay - showing hundreds of thousands were withholding payment. Subsequent figures confirmed that this non-payment movement stretched Scotland-wide.
Labour local government spokesman David Blunkett immediately condemned this inspiring level of resistance. ‘The blame for such high levels of non-payment’, he declared ‘must be placed squarely at this government’s door’. Scottish Labour councils eagerly joined the chorus, angrily refuting claims that they weren’t pursuing non-payers aggressively enough - falling over each other in the rush to prove their commitment to enforcing payment.
In England and Wales - as well as in Scotland - the problem that the Labour Party faces in trying to sell the idea that what its doing its ‘complying reluctantly with the hated Tory tax’, is that Labour’s compliance has been anything but reluctant. In practically every single case, Labour’s response has been one of active, enthusiastic support.
Lewisham Labour council in
The Labour Party’s fear of the anti-poll tax movement is growing. Before now, Labour has been willing to lend support to demonstrations against the ‘community charge’ as a low-risk way of parading its ‘opposition’ to poll tax. But in mid-December Neil Kinnock rejected a plan from his own front-bench poll tax spokesmen to call a national demonstration on April 1 1990, because he feared that groups committed to non-payment and strike action might ‘take advantage’ of the situation - and expose Labour’s true poll tax colours.
WHAT LIES BEHIND THE
‘Poll tax: make it easy on yourself - don’t pay’
IN ORGANISING OPPOSITION to the poll tax, it’s crucial that we understand the objectives the government has in its sights introducing the ‘community charge’, and analyse it in context with other moves that it is making.
Obviously, there’s the straightforward element of wealth re-distribution: taking money from the poor and giving it to the rich. But that isn’t the key element of the strategy here. There are far less risky, and simpler ways of getting cash for the rich from the poor.
The poll tax is the cornerstone of the Tory’s strategy for destroying the political and financial power of local councils.
In the years before poll tax, the Tories have repeated taken chunks from that power base: rate capping, cuts in rate support grants, compulsory tendering of services, the abolition of the GLC and the Metropolitan authorities, the right-to-buy council house legislation, and so on and so on.
Now they have set their sights on dismantling council housing, forcing competitive tendering on such things as meals-on-wheels, home helps, and - through the ‘opt-out’ proposals - of severing councils’ links with local schools and hospitals.
The Tories vision for the future of local government is one in which small groups of budget managers and civil servants - with no financial or political clout - oversee the running of a massively reduced network of privatised contractors.
‘Accountability’ is the key word the Tories bandy about when they justify the introduction of the community charge. Accountability of the council to the electors who vote them in to office. The flat-rate poll tax, by shifting the burden of paying for council services far more onto the shoulders of the poor, will mean that working class people won’t be able to afford to vote in councils prepared to spend money on the services they need and use. Come election time, parties will compete to offer voters the lowest poll tax rates - by budgeting to spend the least money on services possible.
Working class families reliant on the dozens of services that the council currently provides will be stuck with a harsh choice: vote for councils committed to maintaining those services, and suffer enormous poll tax bills that you can’t afford; or vote for the party that, offers the lower poll tax rate that you might be able to afford, and lose the services that you need. That is what is meant by ‘accountability’: if the poor want services they should damn well pay for them.
At the same time the Tories has taken from councils the power to levy rates on local businesses. The traditional Labour left council’s way of upping revenue, has been to slap higher bills on business and industry - before increasing domestic rates. Now the Tories will set ‘enterprise. friendly’ business rate nationally - far lower than present levels - leaving councils with no get-out, and meaning that even to maintain services at current levels, domestic bills will have to soar.
The Tories want to end for ever the possibility of a return of ‘municipal socialism’, by forcing left-Labour councils either to decimate their own services in a bid to set low pail tax rates and keep hold of office; or offer services their supporters can’t afford and make themselves unelectable.
Labour City Council has put the choice starkly. It offers two options: ‘A poll
tax bill of £708 per person; or - to get a figure of around £400 per person - a
£95 million package of cuts’.
As an incentive, the government recently published its own estimates of ‘acceptable’ levels of council spending - and a list of accompanying poll tax rates. On the figures 380 councils out of 402 already ‘overspend’. The government
hope to blame higher than-estimated poll tax bills on ‘irresponsible’ local councils who spend too much.
Poll tax Minister John Patten recently hammered the message home - announcing that the Tories would ‘poll tax cap’ any authority that didn’t slash budgets, destroy services and sack workers.
Patten is just playing safe. He knows - and the Tories know - that Labour
councils will dutifully fall in line one after another. After the rate-capping
battles of a few years ago, and the actions of inner
anything, Tories councillors in the leafy-Shires of southern
It’s for that reason that the Tories expect the non-payment campaign against appalling high poll tax rates only to last for two or three years at most.
Not because people will give up on the struggle, but because within that time, they predict poll tax levels will fall back to something like average existing rates bills, as councils wage a downwards spiralling budget-war in the hope of winning power.
While we need to understand the objectives of the Tory’s war on councils, the only concern for working class people is in the interests of our class - immediate and long-term.
It’s not in our interest to rush to defend the institution of local government; to back one section of the State against another; or to defend the idea of ‘benevolent’ councils providing the ‘deserving poor’ with services we should be ‘grateful’ for.
We oppose the poll tax because it means massive financial burdens for working class people, threatens the decimation of services that working class people need and use, and promises to throw thousands of council workers onto the dole. We oppose it because it means working class people being subject to wage arrestments, bailiffs raids, court fines and theft of their benefits.
Not because its ‘undemocratic’, not because its ‘unfair’, not because its ‘unjust’. Because we know that for the working class those concepts are meaningless under capitalism, and it implies that we think there is a ‘just’ and a ‘fair’ system to be had under capitalism.
It’s not our job to come up with ‘better’ ways of generating local council income, of funding local services - for that same reason.
Our interest is in seeing the poll tax defeated by the organised power of the whole working class. In encouraging people to build their own direct forms of organisation, that cross the artificial boundaries that are erected between workplace and community organisation, and offer the potential of specific, partial struggles being generalised into wider battles.
Crushing the ‘community charge’ would increase our class’s confidence - and strengthen our ability to take on the whole stinking system that spawned the poll tax in the first place.
Our eventual goal must be to do away with that system and create a society in which we are able to exercise real control over our lives.
A society without bosses or political parasites, where we will be able to organise our lives for the mutual benefit of all, not a small class or employers and property owners.
On an immediate practical level that means arguing for mass action, against symbolic ‘committees of 100’, for direct contact with groups of workers and against leaving it up to the unions, for action against councils not for alliances with ‘progressive’ councillors. It means exposing the hidden agenda of the authoritarian-Left and other would be bosses, and repeatedly demonstrating the true role of the Labour Party and trade unions.
The fight against the poll tax remains one battle in an on-going class war.
THE ‘LEFT’AND THE
‘Without Militant there’d be
no organised campaign against the poll tax’
Militant newspaper, February 2 1990
‘Sadly, because party members were told
that non-payment was a diversion, and an irrelevance,
many of our own comrades have paid their poll tax’
WHILE EACH OF the dozens of ‘Left-wing’ political parties involved in the anti-poll tax movement have unveiled their own supposedly-distinct ‘strategy for winning’ - they’ve all been united on the central question of who they think holds the key to victory: and it isn’t the working class.
The ‘responsibility’ for the success of the poll tax struggle - according to the Left - lies with the leaders of the Labour Party and the trade union movement.
The problem - as the Left sees it - is not that union and Labour leaders are out to wreck the poll tax struggle, but that they aren’t - as yet - doing enough to support it.
Throughout the campaign the Left have endorsed each successive act of sabotage by those bureaucrats - even claiming that these acts prove that the bureaucracy is moving in the right direction.
So when - in a calculated attempt to head-off widespread industrial unrest over the poll tax - the Scottish TUC called the now-infamous eleven-minute ‘tea-break stoppage’ against the poll tax, they won overwhelming backing from the Left - whose only objection seemed to be that this wasn’t really ‘long enough’. The Socialist Workers Party called on workers to ‘make the most of the action’ and ‘demand’ that the bureaucrats extend it.
Instead of denouncing it as a wrecking-tactic, the Left took the opportunity to applaud the STUC’s ‘fighting spirit’.
The Left have sought to excuse, justify and explain away the Labour Party’s attacks on the struggle - endlessly repeating their ‘surprise’ at Kinnock’s compliance with the poll tax, and bemoaning the ‘cowardice’ of Labour councillors who ‘won’t fight’.
They’ve sought to focus attention away from the need to build autonomous working class action against all branches of the poll tax machine - and towards placing ‘demands’ on our enemies in town halls, union offices and in Parliament not to attack us.
At every turn, the Left has sought to undermine the growing confidence and independence of working class poll tax resistance - hoping to take the initiative out of the hands of working class activists, and give it back to the very forces that want to destroy the chance of a real battle against the poll tax.
Some on the Left genuinely believe that Kinnock and Co can be ‘forced’ to fight. But others issue ‘demands’ on Labour leaders knowing in advance that such calls are hopeless. They do this in the hope that people will conclude -when their ‘demands’ aren’t realised - that what’s needed are ‘new’ and ‘better’ leaders, politicians, bureaucrats and officials that are ‘really on our side’.
As the Socialist Workers Party poll tax pamphlet bluntly explains: ‘If the real responsibility for the campaign is pinned squarely where it belongs, it will enable people to see where the real fault for any defeat lies. Pointing away from the organised working class lets Labour and trade union leaders off the hook. For it is they who have the power to launch activity and who are running away from their responsibility’.
In other words, for the SWP and their ilk the ‘job of socialists’ is to cynically and dishonestly push the campaign towards a strategy they know can only fail - in the hope of picking up members for the party machine in the aftermath of its collapse.
The Socialist Workers Party
The one consistent theme that runs right through the story of the SWP’s ever-changing analysis of the poll tax fight has been their blatant opportunism.
As the Party leaders have continually re-assessed the mood of the movement, their ‘line’ has been repeatedly rehashed and repackaged in a desperate attempt to keep in step with the struggle.
To start with, the SWP actively attacked the idea of community-based resistance to the poll tax - dismissing it (in much the same way as Kinnock did) as ‘unrealistic’. For the SWP, only action in the workplace held out any hope at all.
Their 1988 poll tax pamphlet (since withdrawn) explained: ‘Community organisation stands in stark contrast to the power of workers organised in the workplace. Community politics diverts people away from the means to win, from the need to mobilise working class activity on a collective basis. And by putting the emphasis on the individual’s will to resist, any difficulties and defeats will be the responsibility of the individual alone’.
By deliberately misinterpreting the non-payment strategy as one relying on individual, isolated acts of unconnected defiance, the SWP sought to .show how much more effective collective industrial action would be. The ‘case’ as they set it up (contrasting individual refusal with collective resistance) proving itself.
For the SWP ‘class action’ only exists in the factory and office - only ‘workers’ have a part to play in the class war. Action that mobilises working class people beyond the factory, that seeks to forge united class-wide action, is - for the SWP - a diversion to be resisted and opposed.
So convinced were the SWP that mass community-based non-payment would collapse within a couple of months in Scotland, that by the early Summer of 1989 in the pages of Socialist Worker the ‘defeat of the poll tax struggle’ had joined the ritual list of set-backs that the working class had suffered in the current ‘down—turn’.
But their leaders
soon sensed that their announcement of the ‘collapse of poll tax resistance’
was unlikely to win them much credibility on the housing estates in
So the Party did an abrupt U-turn. Suddenly ‘diversionary’ community-action was a struggle worth fighting. In total contradiction to their earlier statements, the pages of Socialist Worker now proclaimed: ‘There is no rigid divide between struggles in the workplace and in the community. Community campaigns can often achieve real victories’.
This was only the latest in a long series of ‘revisions’ of the Party line.
Initially the SWP argued strongly for non-registration. Later they dropped this demand. Then they criticised Labour leaders for not ‘leading a non-registration campaign’. Later still, they concluded non-registration was ‘a mistaken tactic’. First off, they supported the building of ‘committees of 100’ of ‘notable’ non-payers, only to decide within weeks that the committees were ‘elitist’ and ‘irrelevant’.
It’s anyone’s guess what the position of the SWP on the poll tax struggle will be next month. Currently the Party hierarchy has ordered the membership to ‘withdraw’ from their poll tax ‘work’ to concentrate their recruitment efforts elsewhere - but its certain they’ll be ordered back in again if their leaders sense the ‘mood ‘ once again offers the potential for signing up some new members.
The Militant Tendency
The Militant Tendency is without doubt the ‘Left’ Party pouring most energy into the poll tax campaign. The motivation behind this high level of involvement is clear.
Under cover of the poll tax fight, Militant hope to rebuild their power base within the lower levels of the Labour Party.
Many months ago, Militant’s leaders decided that the emerging poll tax struggle would be an ideal ‘host’ for their parasitical work. They hoped that by creating ‘community’ organisations committed to defeating the poll tax through a non—payment campaign they could win themselves recruits both to the Tendency and to the Labour Party itself.
Every decision they have made on their campaigning strategy has been based on what they think best serves the interests of their struggle within the Labour Party - not on what’s best for beating the poll tax.
As Labour leaders have cottoned on to what Militant are up to, Kinnock has ‘suspended’ a number of local Labour Party branches, while investigations are carried out into Militant’s activities.
Despite Militant’s claims that they oppose these ‘witchhunts’ against them - they are, in fact, delighted when their members are expelled from the Party. That’s because it offers them the chance to draw anger and energy away from the poll tax fight, and re-direct it into defending their supporters from attack.
Their ‘disbelief’ and ‘outrage’ at their members being booted out is always well rehearsed. In fact, the expulsions are part and parcel of Militant’s battle—plan - and are the beginning of what, for them, is the real fight.
Militant frequently claim to be ‘leading the fight against the poll tax’ - and they’ve launched a national Front-organisation (The All British Anti-Poll Tax Federation) in a bid to stamp their leadership on the movement.
Militant seek to run the campaign by freezing-out or crushing independent groups that oppose their manipulation. The set of ‘committees’ full of their own supporters, try to, seize key posts in local poll tax ‘unions’, pack meetings with ‘delegates’ from bogus-community groups and worse.
Right from the start of the poll tax struggle, people have mobilised to oppose Militant. Their hopes to establish a stranglehold on the campaign have been dashed - and increasing numbers of people are coming to realise what Militant’s ‘hidden agenda’ is really all about.
Of course, Militant and the SWP are only two symptoms of a more widespread disease. Their are dozens of similar ‘Left-wing’ parties sharing identical assumptions - forever lecturing working class people resisting the poll tax that without the support of Kinnock and the TUC, their struggle is doomed to defeat. Their only concern is in bolstering their own Party empires on the backs of the working class.
Their interference in the poll tax struggle is motivated purely out of this self-interest. They have nothing to offer us.
WHAT IS THE POLL TAX?
‘To actually make enough cutbacks
to get poll tax spending down to government limits,
we would have to close half our schools’
leader Labour group,
The poll tax - or ‘community charge’ - is a flat-rate tax levied on people, (not on property, as the old rates system was). Everyone over 18 will have to pay (with very few exceptions).