Anarchist Discussion Forums

by **Infinite** » Mon Aug 16, 2010 4:36 am

It's bad for kids, like a moderate form of child abuse. Espescially young kids, think of how bad you'd feel fucking in front of a little kid. They aren't ready to see that, it's not paranoia. Morality in a general sense isn't bad, morality is why we oppose things like war and injustice.

by **testpattern** » Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:22 am

Man, I already have enough bodily fluids to worry about sitting in on the train every day. It ain't hygienic. You are inflicting your love juice on the public, and that infringes upon my right to not accidentally sit in them. Not to mention that it's generally in poor taste.

by **coup-detat** » Fri Jan 08, 2010 9:06 am

jack wrote:If I pulled out my dick in front of a girl, wouldn't that be sexual harassment?

Yet, you think it's not bad as long as it's going in someone else's orifice.

Your ideas are inconsistent, illogical, and plain fucking retarded.

This.

by **jack** » Mon Jan 04, 2010 7:54 pm

African_Prince wrote:You should be allowed to do with your body what you want to do (so long as you don't violate anyone elses right to do the same with theirs). If you want to have sex in a park in broad daylight, on the subway, on your front lawn etc., you should have that right. I am opposed to sexual harassment (ie. constant subliminal messages, stalking, etc.) but I don't think this qualifies. Other people might not want to see you have sex but they might not want to see you exist either, they might be offended by your simply breathing, that doesn't mean you don't have a right to. It's not their business.

If I pulled out my dick in front of a girl, wouldn't that be sexual harassment?

Yet, you think it's not bad as long as it's going in someone else's orifice.

Your ideas are inconsistent, illogical, and plain fucking retarded.

by **Guest le guest** » Sun Jan 03, 2010 8:16 pm

I don't know why you guys (and anarchists too) are talking about bullshit tests that don't measure anything except a rarefied concept which doesn't actually exist. Gould demolishes this nonsense in his book: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mismeasure_of_Man

by **AndyMalroes** » Sun Jan 03, 2010 4:51 pm

I don't think intelligence can be measured through an IQ test or should be seen as strictly academic (someone knowing alot about the Spanish Civil War is the same as someone knowing alot about...say...woodshop) specialty is no difference as long as the thought is logical and such.

Don't IQ tests measure your capacity to learn? I'm pretty sure they don't test general knowledge but I could be wrong. (I thought they did several tests for abstract thinking and other shit)

by **African_Prince** » Sun Jan 03, 2010 2:19 pm

You should be allowed to do with your body what you want to do (so long as you don't violate anyone elses right to do the same with theirs). If you want to have sex in a park in broad daylight, on the subway, on your front lawn etc., you should have that right. I am opposed to sexual harassment (ie. constant subliminal messages, stalking, etc.) but I don't think this qualifies. Other people might not want to see you have sex but they might not want to see you exist either, they might be offended by your simply breathing, that doesn't mean you don't have a right to. It's not their business.

by **jack** » Fri Jan 01, 2010 12:48 am

On teh internets I've gotten between 141 and 164ish, but I haven't taken a serious one, and haven't done one since I was 13. With that, I don't think intelligence can be measured through an IQ test or should be seen as strictly academic (someone knowing alot about the Spanish Civil War is the same as someone knowing alot about...say...woodshop) specialty is no difference as long as the thought is logical and such.

by **AndyMalroes** » Thu Dec 31, 2009 10:22 pm

Never got tested, my parent's always said that ignorance is bliss...hang on a second! :lol:

by **AndyMalroes** » Thu Dec 31, 2009 10:17 pm

Double post

by **coup-detat** » Thu Dec 31, 2009 10:12 pm

141, bitches.

by **Zazaban** » Wed Dec 30, 2009 11:36 pm

IQ is conjecture at best, based on hundred-year old tests. I will say it's a vague approximation, but it's silly to make a big deal about it.

I have an IQ of 139 anyway, so I win either way. HAHA!

by **AndyMalroes** » Mon Dec 28, 2009 11:46 pm

You are superior in that you are more worthy of existence? You are more worthy of empathy and caring? Is that what you mean by superior? You are superior in your capacity to experience suffering and joy?

No...I think he meant intellectually superior, but seriously nice straw-man!

just as I'm intellectually superior to someone with an IQ of 50.

by **saru** » Mon Dec 28, 2009 6:56 pm

jack wrote:That's usually autism, not mental retardation (80 and below is retarded). But they may be superior to me in playing the double bass, but I'm superior in every other way.

You are superior in that you are more worthy of existence? You are more worthy of empathy and caring? Is that what you mean by superior? You are superior in your capacity to experience suffering and joy?

by **jack** » Mon Dec 28, 2009 5:28 pm

That's usually autism, not mental retardation (80 and below is retarded). But they may be superior to me in playing the double bass, but I'm superior in every other way.

Anarchist Discussion Forums

Public sex

Post a reply

Expand view Topic review: Public sex

Re: Public sex

Re: Public sex

Re: Public sex

Re: Public sex

Re: Public sex

Re: Public sex

Re: Public sex

Re: Public sex

Re: Public sex

Re: Public sex

Re: Public sex

Re: Public sex

Re: Public sex

Re: Public sex

Re: Public sex