Anarchist Discussion Forums

A better caption would be : <br> <br>"I'll swap you this flower for that 'black mamba' dildo"

[color=green]what if that cop is about to kill you? or one of your family members (mumia, anyone?), or a comrade?</font color=green> <br> <br>Then its self defence and very different from killing them just because they are cops.

"Nah, killing a cop, or anyone, makes you no better than the fascists. " <br> <br>what if that cop is about to kill you? or one of your family members (mumia, anyone?), or a comrade? <br>

Damn, I'm an addict now.

Nah, killing a cop, or anyone, makes you no better than the fascists.

[img]http://www.sfgate.com/chronicle/pictures/2003/02/17/mn_protest55-cg.jpg[/img] <br> <br>Heh! I wonder what's going through that cop's mind? <br> <br>"Don't make eye contact! Dear GOD, don't make eye contact!" [img]/wwwthreads/images/icons/wink.gif[/img]

"I don't think anyone would question the anarchist credentials of Peter Kropotkin" <br> <br>Ive seen it done on more than one occasion.

"Anarchists don't believe in morality." <br> <br>I don't think anyone would question the anarchist credentials of Peter Kropotkin, and he wrote "Anarchist Morality." Morality is not by definition religious, I usually try to use the word ethics instead. I slipped. Sorry. As to the rest of your letter, just b/c you believe in revolution doesn't mean you have to go around shooting/stabbing/whatever cops. That's just dumb, and it doesn't help the cause. You've seen the failure of "anarchist" terrorism around the early 1900s. Yeah, it didn't work then, so it won't now. And just b/c the coppers may kill folks sometimes without justification, which is absolutely awful, that doesn't mean you get to go out and kill them at random. <br> <br>"What can one say? <br>I will not obey!"

<blockquote><font class="small">In reply to:</font><hr><p>The police have totally ruined society and are dead set on destroying our future.<p><hr></blockquote>That's pretty reductionist. The police are a reflexive response, like going into shock after blood loss: they make things worse, but only because the body they exist within is trying to salvage itself (albeit through ass-backwards means.) The true evil in our society is the elites who [i]desire[/i] the shock. <blockquote><font class="small">In reply to:</font><hr><p>They are the most evil sect in existence, used most effectively by the "string lords" above...those who make us dance like puppets.<p><hr></blockquote>Is the scourge more evil than the slavedriver?

and the idiocy continues... <br> <br>[img]http://www.sfgate.com/chronicle/pictures/2003/02/17/mn_protest55-cg.jpg[/img]

Should I have felt like pointing out more concrete and valid reasons for everything I choose to say, there would not be enough time for me to do anything but type, as noone is ever satisfied with any amount of convincing words.

Actually in regards to Labadire, I was never assuming or said anything to the effect that I had any idea of who or what he writes. I was merely pointing out the fact that under the context that you used as your quotes, you were contradicting yourself. <br> <br>Should I learn how to make quotes with pretty colors or learn how to quote things better, I will do so, but until then bear with me and stop putting words in my mouth.

<blockquote><font class="small">In reply to:</font><hr><p> Anarchists don't believe in morality. <p><hr></blockquote> <br>I'm an anarchist and I believe in morality.

Wrong punches in the head that is so childish go for the groin. <br> <br>Cockpunch their authorities, their gods, their kings, their messiahs! [img]/wwwthreads/images/icons/wink.gif[/img]

You might wish to work on your communication skills. The only thing I could get across from you is the following. <br> <br>[color=green]I would say that it is Labadire who is not the anarchist, for he rules out the freedom to choose</font color=green> <br> <br>I doubt you are even familiar with who Joseph Labadie is, yet you apparently have no difficulty in playing god and casting out those who you disagree with - even though Labadie was an anarchist, and was recognized as an anarchist, long before you ever came into existence. <br> <br>And it is not as if you even bothered to give a valid reason, or at least any reason worthy of consideration. A mere excuse is all you offered and it is a most shallow and superficial one at that. Anarchism has never given you or anyone else the "freedom to choose" whatever it is you wish to do. Anarchism does not give you the "freedom to choose" to exploit the working class. Anarchism does not give you the "freedom to choose" to be a fascist. Or a capitalist. Or a statist. Or a president. If you are looking for an "anything goes" philosophy, then anarchism is [i]not[/i] it. You might as well say that every anarchist is not an anarchist because none of them would give anyone the freedom to choose everything. <br> <br>What freedom of choice are [i]you[/i] giving to a human being when you choose to take away his or her life?