by captainbeefheart » Sun Jun 14, 2009 3:52 am
Anarchism as a word may well describe any system other than the elite may prescribe to. In practice Bakunin and your other heroes were masons who were quids in with lenin. Now largely concentrated within the big cities, totally interdependent (in to the pen the ant) with the state - the anarchists (those that make an arc) have no social values worth defending.
They are unequivocal regarding defending faggotry when all evidence points to the negative effects of such lifestyles (low life expectancy due to disease, high rate of suicide, highest murder rate and accidental death rate amongst partners).
They are unequivocal regarding defending black and asian youth when most with a pair of eyes can tell the culture the darkies and slitty-eyes have embraced (pimping, drug dealing, peadophilia and gangsterism) has been created by the establishment and encouraged to prosper.
They are unequivocal regarding defending womens rights when all evidence points to a culture rampant with anti white male discrimination.
They are unequivocal regarding thier silence on chinese restaurants, when all evidence points to the vast majority of revolutionary movements being a creation of the elusive culinary orders within.
It is an indisputable fact that Chinese Restaurants control the world. You can find them in every country on Earth. It is a well known fact that Pol Pot spent several years running a Dim-Sum in Chattanooga. And it is also a proven fact that anarchism is a sham created by these deviants. It is a well known fact that Mikhail Bakunin enjoyed having dinner on Thursdays at a restaurant owned by one MAO ZEDONG, KNOWN SATANIST.
And Emma Goldman was in fact a close friend of Hubert Gallup, who I understand was a huge fan of Chop-Suey.
No use denying it. Don't even try.
Anarchism as a word may well describe any system other than the elite may prescribe to. In practice Bakunin and your other heroes were masons who were quids in with lenin. Now largely concentrated within the big cities, totally interdependent (in to the pen the ant) with the state - the anarchists (those that make an arc) have no social values worth defending.
They are unequivocal regarding defending faggotry when all evidence points to the negative effects of such lifestyles (low life expectancy due to disease, high rate of suicide, highest murder rate and accidental death rate amongst partners).
They are unequivocal regarding defending black and asian youth when most with a pair of eyes can tell the culture the darkies and slitty-eyes have embraced (pimping, drug dealing, peadophilia and gangsterism) has been created by the establishment and encouraged to prosper.
They are unequivocal regarding defending womens rights when all evidence points to a culture rampant with anti white male discrimination.
They are unequivocal regarding thier silence on chinese restaurants, when all evidence points to the vast majority of revolutionary movements being a creation of the elusive culinary orders within.
It is an indisputable fact that Chinese Restaurants control the world. You can find them in every country on Earth. It is a well known fact that Pol Pot spent several years running a Dim-Sum in Chattanooga. And it is also a proven fact that anarchism is a sham created by these deviants. It is a well known fact that Mikhail Bakunin enjoyed having dinner on Thursdays at a restaurant owned by one MAO ZEDONG, KNOWN SATANIST.
And Emma Goldman was in fact a close friend of Hubert Gallup, who I understand was a huge fan of Chop-Suey.
No use denying it. Don't even try.