Watson is a liar and alcoholic and whoremonger, he is also mentally ill - having being 'sectioned' on at least one occaision and a regular attendee of 'Mad Pride' marches. We were in communication for many years, even so what I despise the most is he has destroyed my anominimity. So if we are going to get this right my name is:
Joseph Robert David Lancaster Burley
OTL: Letter to Joe Lancaster: Conspiracy
http://www.unkant.com/2012/03/otl-letter...5751579637The reply presented to Watson via email.
Watson you odious callous drunkard,
You destroyed any last bit of respect I had for you. You made me feel bad for putting the quote on there. To say "In fact come to think of it I've never read anything you've written, on screen or on paper" is a rotten bare faced lie when you said what I quoted in response to an email I sent you with an article posted in "freemasonry and anarchism"! Is your memory so alcohol sosselled that you have no memory of what you actually say anymore? Do you need me to provide a copy of the email? If I had known you would be so pathetic about it I wouldn't have bothered - it's not as though anyone actually knows who you are anyway!
Yes, despite decades of funding and intense and fervent nepotism, you have managed to remain singularly unknown to all but the most obscure, self-insulated academic fringe groups, groups composed of individuals I have always felt largely ashamed to be associated with, even then in my drug addled state of mind! That in itself speaks volumes for the politics you and your kin advocate, and any 'target audience' you may (or more likely - may not) attract.
At the same time as thousands turn away from Marxism, pop culture and the fake left/right bullshit in favor of New World Order research and trying to get to grips with freemasonry, you sit there crying conspiracy theory! I'm hardly surprised though - your meal ticket is at stake!
Did I take any offence at your perverted interpretation of the conversations we had in Sheffield that you broadcast all over London without my permission? Of course not! Simply because such personal insults are not in my nature (unless provoked), and I have always had bigger fish to fry than some half-baked academic drunkard. After your latest correspondence (or six pages of largely personal insults) if "Freemasonry and Anarchism" ever gets beyond the first print of 50, I will happily take your miserable moniker off the back and the 'Thanks to..' section.
Personal insults and histrionics in the place of argument and counter argument shame your own corrupted cause but if you have not reached the necessary level of politeness at your old age I'm sure you never will.
For the record, I never smoked anything other than weed in the presence of you and my mum, and my days with opiates are thankfully long since over, not that I didnt learn a lot during the pro-cess.
Leftish idiocy is what you made our conversations into on-air all over London, so don't bother to bring me up on not quoting the transcript in its entirety when you take all manner of artistic license with the ideas and words of others when it suits your own cause. There are more than enough attacks on the right in "Freemasonry and Anarchism" if you bother to look for them. I care not for attracting the left or the right but rather those who have had enough of both.
I will leave such analysis of spanking children and sadomasochism to your own depraved cannon, though I am quite amazed you have managed to make reference to the subject without indulging in your customary brand of puerile celebration as you usually do with such imagery involving children. And this from a man who openly promotes such sadomasochism or "the pleasures incumbant upon the practice of consensual bondage". What a joker you are Watson, why do you think I left it out of the transcript!
I am very interested in the phenomenon of 'sociopathy' too, though I feel you represent a far better example than myself!
It is only a clown (or an ageing alcoholic Marxist whoremonger (or 'libertine' as they call themselves)) that would deny the forced communization of humans creates sexual deprivation, perversity and "mass mental disease" or 'instinctual drives' as you laughingly call them. If however, promotion of such negative side effects of city life form a considerable aspect of ones ostensibly Marxist ideology then it might be understandable such persons may take objection!
"The impact of "accidental" cities is already contributing to the depersonalization of individual life as the kinship structure contracts and enduring relations of friendship become more difficult to maintain. Julian Huxley was perhaps guilty of only slight exaggeration when he warned that "overcrowding in animals leads to distorted neurotic and downright pathological behavior. We can be sure that the same is true in principle of people. City life today is definitely leading to mass mental disease, to growing vandalism and possible eruptions of mass violence". GN Carstairs, in Why is man aggressive (Impact of science on society, April - June 1968, p90), argues that population growth, crowding and social oppression all contribute to irrational and intensified aggression. Experiments on rats seem to bear this out; observation of human behavior in large cities seems to warrant a similar conclusion" P17, The onset of the Technetronic age, Americas role in the Technetronic era, Zbigniew brzezinski, 1970, Viking Press.
Psychoanalysis? Do you really hold faith in such voyeurism? And this from a man who has always attempted to elevate his half-baked ramblings (even personal correspondence) to the level of (blatantly attention seeking) performance art!
"And by the way show business and psychopathy are very closely linked because one of the largest groups are the attention seeking hysterical psychopaths and that's politicians and actors by the way."
Or
"He's a little ham actor who waves his hands a lot" Alan Watt, Cutting Through The Matrix, 09/06/2011
Or
"Across every sphere of public life those deviants that crave power and desire success' (usually defined in monetary and sexual terminology) are celebrated as entrepreneurs, gangsters, buccaneers, (and especially) revolutionaries and cultural icons". Freemasonry and Anarchism, 2011
According to you and Freud or 'Fraud', when an individual states that rape, sodomy and pedophilia are such ancient and widespread practices of the Elite (as has been well recorded), and that such practices exert horrific consequences on the victims and wider society, and that such practices form an integral aspect of the religion of the elite (freemasonry), you simply wish to denounce the commentators as repressed! These are the lives of women and children you play your linguistic games with Watson!
"In the final analysis they are little more than apologists for predatory bi-sexual pedophiles". Freemasonry and Anarchism, 2011
Any man who emblazons his own publications with a picture of his penis is surely in a tight corner with regards to commenting on the uses of imagery by others, though no doubt you have some retarded explanation!
A picture is worth a thousand words, and your denunciation of the use of pictures to display Marxist Masons ignores all the written evidence collected by Antony Sutton, and others, some of which is quoted in the writings on Russia. So instead of tackling the written material, you refer to them "imitating Napolean's full length portrait" simultaneously blissfully ignorant of Napolean's freemasonry and his use of the sign! Give me the anarchist apologists explanations (handwarming or abdominal issues) to yours anyday!
At least If I attack the left, it is done after having spent some time amongst it and studying it. You Watson, so appallingly ignorant of masonry, don't even realise Napolean himself was displaying his own allegiance to masonry (the 'hidden hand'). Time to buy a copy of 'freemasonry for dummies'?
At the same time, all the highly documented funding of Marxists by rich bankers and its allegiances to Grand Orient / Anglo-American Freemasonry are swept under the carpet! How convenient!
The pictures are an accompaniment to the words, and as though such imagery of Revolutionary leaders displaying allegiance to masonry (not off the cuff photos but highly staged poses) mitigates against thought - it provides further information to support the fact that communism was an utterly contrived movement which can easily be traced to Grand Orient Freemasonry and elite funding mechanisms.
Though Zappa may be a significant part of the core of your own 'oeuvre' or whatever else you want to call it, it certainly isn't mine, and through all your bleating about Zappa you never acknowledge that he was, again, utterly contrived and a product of the American culture creation industry, a 'weaponised' form of culture as he states himself in 200 motels.
".They know just as many of you vigilant and thoroughly upstanding citizens have discovered for yourselves - the power of pop music to corrupt and putrefy the minds of world youth are virtually limitless". As I said in Freemasonry and Anarchism "talk about a criminal admission"!
I don't regard Zappa as a 'blogger to agree with' any more than I do Alan Watt, not that you are qualified to comment on Alan's words or ideas, as if you were familiar you would have noticed how many times Alan has paraphrased my own comments and I his, but rather I appreciate the value of comments Zappa made at certain times, as and when they suit my argument, as you do yourself.
"Zappa - to alter or effect damage by electricity - pop music" Freemasonry and Anarchism, 2011. I quite agree Zappa presents the good material inbetween the 'frustrating' and its effect is to annoy and 'alter' the listener, though I would disagree such material is ultimately positive. Zappa incessantly promoted promiscuity and to some extent his own terminal prostrate problems can only be seen as poetic justice in return for his own self-confessed 'devils advocacy'.
As I say to the children at school 'you won't be laughing when it turns green and drops off' and neither was Zappa at the end of his life.
Rather than actually addressing all the evidence collected which very clearly points to the fact that Laurel Canyon was a CIA/Mason front to push the hippie movement, free love, drug addiction and sexual perversity etc, you ignore it! Again turning an enourmous blind eye to unsightly reality, as the consequences of such conclusions are devastating to the very shaky foundations of your elite sponsored frankfurtian fuckeries!
True rebels are always destroyed by the establishment, not funded and sustained by it. "..put quite bluntly if your little social clubs ever became anything of a threat they'd wipe you out of existence" however if they suit the elites campaign of degradation of the masses under the banner of multiculturalism, athiesm and 'sexual liberation' they are likely to receive considerable funding!
Quinceys Confessions show the man led a poverty stricken nomadic existence and was plagued with all manner of woes in later years, he is the only drug diarist ever to describe addiction and still preserve his humanity. Your attack on Quincey and Poe draws me ever closer to them, both staunch anti-masons I have discovered, with Quincey bearing the unusual title of being an English anti mason.
Regarding Clinton, who I have never particularly rated, it's a shame you never had the decency to explore the recommendations of the man whose music you so obviously respect. He is not the only black commentator to remark on 'pale horses' importance, as Professor Griff (ex Public Enemy) and others sing its praises, and such commentators never claimed Cooper was racist, rather that those (black) commentators deride hip-hop in exactly the same manner I do - music of the ghetto indeed!
Coopers 'Pale Horse' is a very important publication. Where else are you going to find such documentation of AIDS, Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars, an excellent potted history of freemasonry and of course 'the protocols'. The only thing which destroys its credibility for me is the UFO information, though Cooper more than redeemed himself with Mystery babylon, and paid for it with his life.
Where is the substantiation that the protocols are false? Lots of accusations of Anti-Semitism, the same as Cooper received for blasting the Scottish rite funded ADL, but never any substantiation.
Strange that Marxism always defends elite Jewry, (hiding its role in the black-slave trade especially) but never the Aryan elite, though the same sentiment the protocols expresses (Jew elites) has very little in common with the ideas and beliefs and history of poor Jews. I am not so stupid to stoop to anti-Semitism but the picture of history Marxists wish to promote confuses the issue further. It leads to ridiculous defenses and denials of very simple facts, which end up alienating huge numbers of persons who hate left/right fascism i.e. the fact the vast majority of Bolsheviks were Jews (and were funded by Aryan elites) who carried out a holocaust against Russian Aryan whites far exceeding in number Nazi death camp victims.
Other highly documented fact presented by Sutton in "Wall Street and the Bolshevik revolution", and his earlier "Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development" are both singularly ignored by leftist sycophants.
Perversely, in turn the Aryan Nazis conducted (a largely elite Jew sponsored) holocaust of Jews in Germany.
Such examples display the Elites willingness to disregard their own peoples and use other races to further their diabolical cause, but without an understanding of the machinations of international freemasonry very few are able to communicate it effectively without appearing biased against a particular side. As Cooper states, the fact that all of the protocols have largely been achieved is proof enough of the truth contained within, and the extent to which Marxists immediately always hysterically scream "anti-Semitism" and dismiss it out of hand, is further proof there is no smoke without fire.
William H Carr discusses several arms of elite freemasonry in "Pawns in the Game" of which elite Jewry is very obviously one. Carr counterpoises elite Jewry against Aryan elites though does not mention African, or Asian elites which are as much a part of the diabolism as the rest. Such history cannot easily be brushed under the carpet or ignored.
Stalinism wound down its death camps only after enough Russians (tens of millions) had been liquidated for it to operate freely (i.e. after agriculture was collectivized (peasantry obliterated), after big brother fascism institutionalized, numerous purges executed successfully etc etc). Are your words some kind of consolation to victims of Stalinism? What disgusting, appalling apologism and nonsense to boot!
Imagining the ills of the world are the result of a conscious conspiracy is as you correctly indicate the cores of my beliefs, though this is not to neglect the (conscious) role the masses have played in the situation.
"It seems like insanity and it seems chaotic but believe you me, it's a very wisely guided chaos, it knows exactly where it's heading for. We do live in a system where everything is planned long in advance, especially the big things that happen on the planet - nothing happens by "accident" nothing happens even in economics by "accident", like bank crashes and so on, it's all known years before what could happen, and all these systems are set in place to prevent it, so when it happens its wanted. Same with the stock market, the stock markets always been full of bubbles and nothing but optimism in this big casino ever kept it going, therefore economists were always told to lie to the public and tell them things are great, things are fantastic - invest. You can keep the stock market going forever with the same bubbles, but no they decided crash it then because it's time to bring in this planned austerity".
"Do you really think anyone, from any nation would've gone and fought against Germany if they knew what the big plans were for that war and after that war. That war was necessary to bring in the UN and the whole big agenda for internationalism and de-nationalization and eventually down to running a world government...The liars who were setting it up knew darn well it was to bring in globalism and internationalism and the end of the nation state."
Alan Watt, Cutting Through The Matrix, 09/06/2011
All major historical events were driven by freemasonry of one form or another, I challenge you to name major historical events which were not results of or controlled by such deliberate subversion. Such a view does relegate the working class to the blind receptacle of social forces, but as the masses by and large worship mammon and psychopathy they are largely as much to blame as the elite. The only 'fight' as you put it has been the one organized by the elite to further their own cause as Russia, Italy, Spain and many other such fake 'revolutions' amply demonstrated. You would have to be seriously divorced from reality or seriously wedded to the old playschool SWP style history books to not see the finger prints of masonrys machinations all over them.
Elites of all bloodlines or the 'high masonic elite' which Gramsci referred to as 'the organising centre of all the traditional forces supporting the state', those 'unconsciously' conducting the carpet bombings of the east, 'unconsciously' creating famine, 'unconsciously' funding fake revolutions to destabalise muslim regions, are 'unconsciously(!)' bringing about a literal hell on earth - a system by which Stalin and Hitler's excesses might appear tame. Though the evidence abounds of rapidly rising leftish fascism as expressed by Orwell in 1984, Marxists wish to negate this, "ignore masonry" they cry in the fight against fascism though the very argument takes us ever closer to fascism itself.
I will not bother to quote all the bodies which 'unconsciously' promote Eugenics and population reduction (of the poor) but to suggest such comments are limited to a handful of conspiracy theorists, and aristocrats and are not part of the (unconscious!) philosophy and religion of the upper eschelons of monopoly capitalism, is (again), a part of your larger effort to turn a blind eye to unsightly reality, a denial which can only continue to prevent frankfurters being taken seriously.
Ever increasing Orwellian surveillance, ever increasing calls for green sustainabilty, ever increasing poisoning of food and water and environment, forever upward spiral of abortions, ever increasing Militarization of police, ever increasing penalties for those guilty of orwellian 'hate crimes', ever increasing degredation and 'communization' of women , but pass the wine and 'Adorno for sodomites' NO FASCISM HERE! Talk about a gulf between concrete objective reality and your own divorced from reality ideology!
Your resignation to the abomination that is hip-hop is further evidence of your lack of acceptance of objective reality - have you actually watched MTV since 1989? It's all pimps and hoes and drug abuse, and as much as you may like to label such criticisms as 'racist' or insinuate as much, it is some stretch to link reactions to the negative impact of hip-hop to the early blues pioneers!
To regard hip hop as the authentic voice of black culture is a hideous racist lie which elevates the black male no higher than a pimp or drug pusher, and the black female as no higher than an 'I-be-an-Les' crack-hoe. It ignores all the various ethnic music's which preceded hip-hop and may have formed an infinitely healthier alternative to it. It also woefully ignores the great number of black commentators who have condemned hip-hop as sheer racist poison to the black community. Look into the backgrounds of those who have funded and sustained hip hop and the politics they promote, again, highly compromising to the opinions of those who wish to elevate rap to an art form instead of understanding its obvious negative effects.
You seem to place great value in not losing one's wallet in the red light district! Is that how you spend your time and money Watson? I have known many whoremongers who could get maximum value for their £20 though I never held them in particularly high regard! More they were prepared to exploit very vulnerable and degraded, abused women in order to satisfy their own perverted urges, or 'instinctual drives' as you call them. As it happens, I could have had any number of nubile whores at well under London prices, in the very early stages of their career, long before such monsters as yourself get your hands on them, but such sexual monetary transactions always made me want to puke!
What a brand of Marxism is yours to elevate such behavior as virtuous! Whore-mongering may form a considerable portion of the aging male (and female?) Marxist's outgoing expenses, but very few have the gall to celebrate it in print as you just did! I have read numerous Marxist analysis which show prevalence of prostitution as a very simple indicator of alienation and degradation i.e. a severe worsening of social conditions. You seem to argue 'don't throw the baby out with the bathwater' - a quite insane proposition when it comes to the enslavement and degradation of women!
What a disgrace you have no interest in bulldozing the whorehouses and red light districts with me, as I would quite happily demolish them under any pretense.
Freemasonry and anarchism is what it is, an insight into the authors mind, a summary of Eugenicist aims, source material on masonry and the occult, information on masonic cover-ups etc etc etc. Some is concretely referenced, some less so, and some strictly my own speculations. It was never meant to present itself a thing of pleasure or a joy to own, more a short compendium of real life horror and abuse and an indication of where we are heading in very plain speaking terms. It offers no way out other than to urge the reader to research it's horrific conclusions.
John Carpenters 'Halloween' and 'Halloween 3' are works of pure black magic, full of codes and references to those with the eyes to see. Rather than holy-wood scriptwriters delving into the same preoccupations as myself the films reek of sickening satanic 'in-jokes' and proof of an utterly diabolical campaign of psychological warfare on the profane. Romero's (Eros of Rome) cinema is equally loaded with masonic lore, especially his racist depiction of whites in his dead trilogy.
I am more than above being tempted by scarlet nymphets of age 13 and engaging in such activities would no doubt condemn oneself to a prolonged period of buggery behind Jail doors, though I have had my share of propositions; 19 year old scarlet nymphets might be an altogether different kettle of fish (or sadly, more likely in this day and age - diseased and rotting fish), but not a suitable subject for writing.
Regarding 'Freemasonry and Anarchism' I would quite agree the formatting is a mess, however upon reading your letter and your comments, and viewing the format of your own text, I am constantly reminded of Trotsky's words regarding revolutionary and 'centrist' positions.
"The misfortune is that the leaders of the PSOP have not broken ―courageously with social patriotism, for they have not broken with Freemasonry, that important reservoir of imperialist
patriotism. The other day I received the excellent pamphlet of Pierre Bailly Yes, Freemasonry Is a Danger. Rejecting all psychological and philosophical hogwash, which hasn't the slightest value since in the course of its entire development Freemasonry has contributed nothing either to science or philosophy, the author approaches the question in a Marxist manner, that is, from the class standpoint. On the basis of the documents of Freemasonry itself he has irrefutably demonstrated its imperialist, reactionary and demoralizing role.
Bailly's pamphlet is, incidentally, the best proof of the fact that in contrast to all other factions and groups our comrades know how to approach a complex problem as proletarian revolutionists. Even the minor fact that Nikolitch's pamphlet, hollow and loaded with bourgeois sentimentality, is very well printed while Bailly's serious work is mimeographed illustrates well enough the social position of centrist and revolutionary ideas. Trotskyism and the PSOP, Leon Trotsky, 1939.
Freemasonry and Anarchism might sit on the shelves of Rare and Racy for a while, but as the blog itself attracted tens of thousands of readers hungry for information on freemasonry, the same will no doubt be true on a much smaller scale of its hard copy version, no matter what form of scorn you or others wish to pour on it.
An idea for a film: I would get one of my Jamaican (or 'underclass' as you call them) friends to beat you senseless with a big old King James bible, though being such a deviant you would probably enjoy it, no doubt claiming the psychosomatic emotion resonating through the ectoplasm represented the symbolic dying gasp of Christian heterosexual normality - or some other such gibberish! Time for another mad pride march Watson?
Or perhaps you might omit a few trips down to the whorehouses in favor of purchasing a copy of Suttons Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development 1917 - 1930? Then you might actually start to educate, rather than entertain yourself - instead of proposing that one is a substitute for the other.
Watson is a liar and alcoholic and whoremonger, he is also mentally ill - having being 'sectioned' on at least one occaision and a regular attendee of 'Mad Pride' marches. We were in communication for many years, even so what I despise the most is he has destroyed my anominimity. So if we are going to get this right my name is:
Joseph Robert David Lancaster Burley
OTL: Letter to Joe Lancaster: Conspiracy
http://www.unkant.com/2012/03/otl-letter...5751579637
The reply presented to Watson via email.
Watson you odious callous drunkard,
You destroyed any last bit of respect I had for you. You made me feel bad for putting the quote on there. To say "In fact come to think of it I've never read anything you've written, on screen or on paper" is a rotten bare faced lie when you said what I quoted in response to an email I sent you with an article posted in "freemasonry and anarchism"! Is your memory so alcohol sosselled that you have no memory of what you actually say anymore? Do you need me to provide a copy of the email? If I had known you would be so pathetic about it I wouldn't have bothered - it's not as though anyone actually knows who you are anyway!
Yes, despite decades of funding and intense and fervent nepotism, you have managed to remain singularly unknown to all but the most obscure, self-insulated academic fringe groups, groups composed of individuals I have always felt largely ashamed to be associated with, even then in my drug addled state of mind! That in itself speaks volumes for the politics you and your kin advocate, and any 'target audience' you may (or more likely - may not) attract.
At the same time as thousands turn away from Marxism, pop culture and the fake left/right bullshit in favor of New World Order research and trying to get to grips with freemasonry, you sit there crying conspiracy theory! I'm hardly surprised though - your meal ticket is at stake!
Did I take any offence at your perverted interpretation of the conversations we had in Sheffield that you broadcast all over London without my permission? Of course not! Simply because such personal insults are not in my nature (unless provoked), and I have always had bigger fish to fry than some half-baked academic drunkard. After your latest correspondence (or six pages of largely personal insults) if "Freemasonry and Anarchism" ever gets beyond the first print of 50, I will happily take your miserable moniker off the back and the 'Thanks to..' section.
Personal insults and histrionics in the place of argument and counter argument shame your own corrupted cause but if you have not reached the necessary level of politeness at your old age I'm sure you never will.
For the record, I never smoked anything other than weed in the presence of you and my mum, and my days with opiates are thankfully long since over, not that I didnt learn a lot during the pro-cess.
Leftish idiocy is what you made our conversations into on-air all over London, so don't bother to bring me up on not quoting the transcript in its entirety when you take all manner of artistic license with the ideas and words of others when it suits your own cause. There are more than enough attacks on the right in "Freemasonry and Anarchism" if you bother to look for them. I care not for attracting the left or the right but rather those who have had enough of both.
I will leave such analysis of spanking children and sadomasochism to your own depraved cannon, though I am quite amazed you have managed to make reference to the subject without indulging in your customary brand of puerile celebration as you usually do with such imagery involving children. And this from a man who openly promotes such sadomasochism or "the pleasures incumbant upon the practice of consensual bondage". What a joker you are Watson, why do you think I left it out of the transcript!
I am very interested in the phenomenon of 'sociopathy' too, though I feel you represent a far better example than myself!
It is only a clown (or an ageing alcoholic Marxist whoremonger (or 'libertine' as they call themselves)) that would deny the forced communization of humans creates sexual deprivation, perversity and "mass mental disease" or 'instinctual drives' as you laughingly call them. If however, promotion of such negative side effects of city life form a considerable aspect of ones ostensibly Marxist ideology then it might be understandable such persons may take objection!
"The impact of "accidental" cities is already contributing to the depersonalization of individual life as the kinship structure contracts and enduring relations of friendship become more difficult to maintain. Julian Huxley was perhaps guilty of only slight exaggeration when he warned that "overcrowding in animals leads to distorted neurotic and downright pathological behavior. We can be sure that the same is true in principle of people. City life today is definitely leading to mass mental disease, to growing vandalism and possible eruptions of mass violence". GN Carstairs, in Why is man aggressive (Impact of science on society, April - June 1968, p90), argues that population growth, crowding and social oppression all contribute to irrational and intensified aggression. Experiments on rats seem to bear this out; observation of human behavior in large cities seems to warrant a similar conclusion" P17, The onset of the Technetronic age, Americas role in the Technetronic era, Zbigniew brzezinski, 1970, Viking Press.
Psychoanalysis? Do you really hold faith in such voyeurism? And this from a man who has always attempted to elevate his half-baked ramblings (even personal correspondence) to the level of (blatantly attention seeking) performance art!
"And by the way show business and psychopathy are very closely linked because one of the largest groups are the attention seeking hysterical psychopaths and that's politicians and actors by the way."
Or
"He's a little ham actor who waves his hands a lot" Alan Watt, Cutting Through The Matrix, 09/06/2011
Or
"Across every sphere of public life those deviants that crave power and desire success' (usually defined in monetary and sexual terminology) are celebrated as entrepreneurs, gangsters, buccaneers, (and especially) revolutionaries and cultural icons". Freemasonry and Anarchism, 2011
According to you and Freud or 'Fraud', when an individual states that rape, sodomy and pedophilia are such ancient and widespread practices of the Elite (as has been well recorded), and that such practices exert horrific consequences on the victims and wider society, and that such practices form an integral aspect of the religion of the elite (freemasonry), you simply wish to denounce the commentators as repressed! These are the lives of women and children you play your linguistic games with Watson!
"In the final analysis they are little more than apologists for predatory bi-sexual pedophiles". Freemasonry and Anarchism, 2011
Any man who emblazons his own publications with a picture of his penis is surely in a tight corner with regards to commenting on the uses of imagery by others, though no doubt you have some retarded explanation!
A picture is worth a thousand words, and your denunciation of the use of pictures to display Marxist Masons ignores all the written evidence collected by Antony Sutton, and others, some of which is quoted in the writings on Russia. So instead of tackling the written material, you refer to them "imitating Napolean's full length portrait" simultaneously blissfully ignorant of Napolean's freemasonry and his use of the sign! Give me the anarchist apologists explanations (handwarming or abdominal issues) to yours anyday!
At least If I attack the left, it is done after having spent some time amongst it and studying it. You Watson, so appallingly ignorant of masonry, don't even realise Napolean himself was displaying his own allegiance to masonry (the 'hidden hand'). Time to buy a copy of 'freemasonry for dummies'?
At the same time, all the highly documented funding of Marxists by rich bankers and its allegiances to Grand Orient / Anglo-American Freemasonry are swept under the carpet! How convenient!
The pictures are an accompaniment to the words, and as though such imagery of Revolutionary leaders displaying allegiance to masonry (not off the cuff photos but highly staged poses) mitigates against thought - it provides further information to support the fact that communism was an utterly contrived movement which can easily be traced to Grand Orient Freemasonry and elite funding mechanisms.
Though Zappa may be a significant part of the core of your own 'oeuvre' or whatever else you want to call it, it certainly isn't mine, and through all your bleating about Zappa you never acknowledge that he was, again, utterly contrived and a product of the American culture creation industry, a 'weaponised' form of culture as he states himself in 200 motels.
".They know just as many of you vigilant and thoroughly upstanding citizens have discovered for yourselves - the power of pop music to corrupt and putrefy the minds of world youth are virtually limitless". As I said in Freemasonry and Anarchism "talk about a criminal admission"!
I don't regard Zappa as a 'blogger to agree with' any more than I do Alan Watt, not that you are qualified to comment on Alan's words or ideas, as if you were familiar you would have noticed how many times Alan has paraphrased my own comments and I his, but rather I appreciate the value of comments Zappa made at certain times, as and when they suit my argument, as you do yourself.
"Zappa - to alter or effect damage by electricity - pop music" Freemasonry and Anarchism, 2011. I quite agree Zappa presents the good material inbetween the 'frustrating' and its effect is to annoy and 'alter' the listener, though I would disagree such material is ultimately positive. Zappa incessantly promoted promiscuity and to some extent his own terminal prostrate problems can only be seen as poetic justice in return for his own self-confessed 'devils advocacy'.
As I say to the children at school 'you won't be laughing when it turns green and drops off' and neither was Zappa at the end of his life.
Rather than actually addressing all the evidence collected which very clearly points to the fact that Laurel Canyon was a CIA/Mason front to push the hippie movement, free love, drug addiction and sexual perversity etc, you ignore it! Again turning an enourmous blind eye to unsightly reality, as the consequences of such conclusions are devastating to the very shaky foundations of your elite sponsored frankfurtian fuckeries!
True rebels are always destroyed by the establishment, not funded and sustained by it. "..put quite bluntly if your little social clubs ever became anything of a threat they'd wipe you out of existence" however if they suit the elites campaign of degradation of the masses under the banner of multiculturalism, athiesm and 'sexual liberation' they are likely to receive considerable funding!
Quinceys Confessions show the man led a poverty stricken nomadic existence and was plagued with all manner of woes in later years, he is the only drug diarist ever to describe addiction and still preserve his humanity. Your attack on Quincey and Poe draws me ever closer to them, both staunch anti-masons I have discovered, with Quincey bearing the unusual title of being an English anti mason.
Regarding Clinton, who I have never particularly rated, it's a shame you never had the decency to explore the recommendations of the man whose music you so obviously respect. He is not the only black commentator to remark on 'pale horses' importance, as Professor Griff (ex Public Enemy) and others sing its praises, and such commentators never claimed Cooper was racist, rather that those (black) commentators deride hip-hop in exactly the same manner I do - music of the ghetto indeed!
Coopers 'Pale Horse' is a very important publication. Where else are you going to find such documentation of AIDS, Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars, an excellent potted history of freemasonry and of course 'the protocols'. The only thing which destroys its credibility for me is the UFO information, though Cooper more than redeemed himself with Mystery babylon, and paid for it with his life.
Where is the substantiation that the protocols are false? Lots of accusations of Anti-Semitism, the same as Cooper received for blasting the Scottish rite funded ADL, but never any substantiation.
Strange that Marxism always defends elite Jewry, (hiding its role in the black-slave trade especially) but never the Aryan elite, though the same sentiment the protocols expresses (Jew elites) has very little in common with the ideas and beliefs and history of poor Jews. I am not so stupid to stoop to anti-Semitism but the picture of history Marxists wish to promote confuses the issue further. It leads to ridiculous defenses and denials of very simple facts, which end up alienating huge numbers of persons who hate left/right fascism i.e. the fact the vast majority of Bolsheviks were Jews (and were funded by Aryan elites) who carried out a holocaust against Russian Aryan whites far exceeding in number Nazi death camp victims.
Other highly documented fact presented by Sutton in "Wall Street and the Bolshevik revolution", and his earlier "Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development" are both singularly ignored by leftist sycophants.
Perversely, in turn the Aryan Nazis conducted (a largely elite Jew sponsored) holocaust of Jews in Germany.
Such examples display the Elites willingness to disregard their own peoples and use other races to further their diabolical cause, but without an understanding of the machinations of international freemasonry very few are able to communicate it effectively without appearing biased against a particular side. As Cooper states, the fact that all of the protocols have largely been achieved is proof enough of the truth contained within, and the extent to which Marxists immediately always hysterically scream "anti-Semitism" and dismiss it out of hand, is further proof there is no smoke without fire.
William H Carr discusses several arms of elite freemasonry in "Pawns in the Game" of which elite Jewry is very obviously one. Carr counterpoises elite Jewry against Aryan elites though does not mention African, or Asian elites which are as much a part of the diabolism as the rest. Such history cannot easily be brushed under the carpet or ignored.
Stalinism wound down its death camps only after enough Russians (tens of millions) had been liquidated for it to operate freely (i.e. after agriculture was collectivized (peasantry obliterated), after big brother fascism institutionalized, numerous purges executed successfully etc etc). Are your words some kind of consolation to victims of Stalinism? What disgusting, appalling apologism and nonsense to boot!
Imagining the ills of the world are the result of a conscious conspiracy is as you correctly indicate the cores of my beliefs, though this is not to neglect the (conscious) role the masses have played in the situation.
"It seems like insanity and it seems chaotic but believe you me, it's a very wisely guided chaos, it knows exactly where it's heading for. We do live in a system where everything is planned long in advance, especially the big things that happen on the planet - nothing happens by "accident" nothing happens even in economics by "accident", like bank crashes and so on, it's all known years before what could happen, and all these systems are set in place to prevent it, so when it happens its wanted. Same with the stock market, the stock markets always been full of bubbles and nothing but optimism in this big casino ever kept it going, therefore economists were always told to lie to the public and tell them things are great, things are fantastic - invest. You can keep the stock market going forever with the same bubbles, but no they decided crash it then because it's time to bring in this planned austerity".
"Do you really think anyone, from any nation would've gone and fought against Germany if they knew what the big plans were for that war and after that war. That war was necessary to bring in the UN and the whole big agenda for internationalism and de-nationalization and eventually down to running a world government...The liars who were setting it up knew darn well it was to bring in globalism and internationalism and the end of the nation state."
Alan Watt, Cutting Through The Matrix, 09/06/2011
All major historical events were driven by freemasonry of one form or another, I challenge you to name major historical events which were not results of or controlled by such deliberate subversion. Such a view does relegate the working class to the blind receptacle of social forces, but as the masses by and large worship mammon and psychopathy they are largely as much to blame as the elite. The only 'fight' as you put it has been the one organized by the elite to further their own cause as Russia, Italy, Spain and many other such fake 'revolutions' amply demonstrated. You would have to be seriously divorced from reality or seriously wedded to the old playschool SWP style history books to not see the finger prints of masonrys machinations all over them.
Elites of all bloodlines or the 'high masonic elite' which Gramsci referred to as 'the organising centre of all the traditional forces supporting the state', those 'unconsciously' conducting the carpet bombings of the east, 'unconsciously' creating famine, 'unconsciously' funding fake revolutions to destabalise muslim regions, are 'unconsciously(!)' bringing about a literal hell on earth - a system by which Stalin and Hitler's excesses might appear tame. Though the evidence abounds of rapidly rising leftish fascism as expressed by Orwell in 1984, Marxists wish to negate this, "ignore masonry" they cry in the fight against fascism though the very argument takes us ever closer to fascism itself.
I will not bother to quote all the bodies which 'unconsciously' promote Eugenics and population reduction (of the poor) but to suggest such comments are limited to a handful of conspiracy theorists, and aristocrats and are not part of the (unconscious!) philosophy and religion of the upper eschelons of monopoly capitalism, is (again), a part of your larger effort to turn a blind eye to unsightly reality, a denial which can only continue to prevent frankfurters being taken seriously.
Ever increasing Orwellian surveillance, ever increasing calls for green sustainabilty, ever increasing poisoning of food and water and environment, forever upward spiral of abortions, ever increasing Militarization of police, ever increasing penalties for those guilty of orwellian 'hate crimes', ever increasing degredation and 'communization' of women , but pass the wine and 'Adorno for sodomites' NO FASCISM HERE! Talk about a gulf between concrete objective reality and your own divorced from reality ideology!
Your resignation to the abomination that is hip-hop is further evidence of your lack of acceptance of objective reality - have you actually watched MTV since 1989? It's all pimps and hoes and drug abuse, and as much as you may like to label such criticisms as 'racist' or insinuate as much, it is some stretch to link reactions to the negative impact of hip-hop to the early blues pioneers!
To regard hip hop as the authentic voice of black culture is a hideous racist lie which elevates the black male no higher than a pimp or drug pusher, and the black female as no higher than an 'I-be-an-Les' crack-hoe. It ignores all the various ethnic music's which preceded hip-hop and may have formed an infinitely healthier alternative to it. It also woefully ignores the great number of black commentators who have condemned hip-hop as sheer racist poison to the black community. Look into the backgrounds of those who have funded and sustained hip hop and the politics they promote, again, highly compromising to the opinions of those who wish to elevate rap to an art form instead of understanding its obvious negative effects.
You seem to place great value in not losing one's wallet in the red light district! Is that how you spend your time and money Watson? I have known many whoremongers who could get maximum value for their £20 though I never held them in particularly high regard! More they were prepared to exploit very vulnerable and degraded, abused women in order to satisfy their own perverted urges, or 'instinctual drives' as you call them. As it happens, I could have had any number of nubile whores at well under London prices, in the very early stages of their career, long before such monsters as yourself get your hands on them, but such sexual monetary transactions always made me want to puke!
What a brand of Marxism is yours to elevate such behavior as virtuous! Whore-mongering may form a considerable portion of the aging male (and female?) Marxist's outgoing expenses, but very few have the gall to celebrate it in print as you just did! I have read numerous Marxist analysis which show prevalence of prostitution as a very simple indicator of alienation and degradation i.e. a severe worsening of social conditions. You seem to argue 'don't throw the baby out with the bathwater' - a quite insane proposition when it comes to the enslavement and degradation of women!
What a disgrace you have no interest in bulldozing the whorehouses and red light districts with me, as I would quite happily demolish them under any pretense.
Freemasonry and anarchism is what it is, an insight into the authors mind, a summary of Eugenicist aims, source material on masonry and the occult, information on masonic cover-ups etc etc etc. Some is concretely referenced, some less so, and some strictly my own speculations. It was never meant to present itself a thing of pleasure or a joy to own, more a short compendium of real life horror and abuse and an indication of where we are heading in very plain speaking terms. It offers no way out other than to urge the reader to research it's horrific conclusions.
John Carpenters 'Halloween' and 'Halloween 3' are works of pure black magic, full of codes and references to those with the eyes to see. Rather than holy-wood scriptwriters delving into the same preoccupations as myself the films reek of sickening satanic 'in-jokes' and proof of an utterly diabolical campaign of psychological warfare on the profane. Romero's (Eros of Rome) cinema is equally loaded with masonic lore, especially his racist depiction of whites in his dead trilogy.
I am more than above being tempted by scarlet nymphets of age 13 and engaging in such activities would no doubt condemn oneself to a prolonged period of buggery behind Jail doors, though I have had my share of propositions; 19 year old scarlet nymphets might be an altogether different kettle of fish (or sadly, more likely in this day and age - diseased and rotting fish), but not a suitable subject for writing.
Regarding 'Freemasonry and Anarchism' I would quite agree the formatting is a mess, however upon reading your letter and your comments, and viewing the format of your own text, I am constantly reminded of Trotsky's words regarding revolutionary and 'centrist' positions.
"The misfortune is that the leaders of the PSOP have not broken ―courageously with social patriotism, for they have not broken with Freemasonry, that important reservoir of imperialist
patriotism. The other day I received the excellent pamphlet of Pierre Bailly Yes, Freemasonry Is a Danger. Rejecting all psychological and philosophical hogwash, which hasn't the slightest value since in the course of its entire development Freemasonry has contributed nothing either to science or philosophy, the author approaches the question in a Marxist manner, that is, from the class standpoint. On the basis of the documents of Freemasonry itself he has irrefutably demonstrated its imperialist, reactionary and demoralizing role.
Bailly's pamphlet is, incidentally, the best proof of the fact that in contrast to all other factions and groups our comrades know how to approach a complex problem as proletarian revolutionists. Even the minor fact that Nikolitch's pamphlet, hollow and loaded with bourgeois sentimentality, is very well printed while Bailly's serious work is mimeographed illustrates well enough the social position of centrist and revolutionary ideas. Trotskyism and the PSOP, Leon Trotsky, 1939.
Freemasonry and Anarchism might sit on the shelves of Rare and Racy for a while, but as the blog itself attracted tens of thousands of readers hungry for information on freemasonry, the same will no doubt be true on a much smaller scale of its hard copy version, no matter what form of scorn you or others wish to pour on it.
An idea for a film: I would get one of my Jamaican (or 'underclass' as you call them) friends to beat you senseless with a big old King James bible, though being such a deviant you would probably enjoy it, no doubt claiming the psychosomatic emotion resonating through the ectoplasm represented the symbolic dying gasp of Christian heterosexual normality - or some other such gibberish! Time for another mad pride march Watson?
Or perhaps you might omit a few trips down to the whorehouses in favor of purchasing a copy of Suttons Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development 1917 - 1930? Then you might actually start to educate, rather than entertain yourself - instead of proposing that one is a substitute for the other.