by Guest » Sat Dec 19, 2009 9:00 am
Quite fascinating about the A-note, actually. "I did not know that. That is some weird, wild, wacky stuff." ~Johnny Carson
I think if we're going to do the state thing, why pull at the frayed edges? Why not reply 1917 but with the critiques of e.g. Luxemburg? A properly democratic Marxist state is the only kind I could tolerate I think. Anything else will just be capitalism with frills and lace and perfume.
About worker pay. Real wages have been stagnant and falling for 30 years. Yet worker productivity has skyrocketed. The difference has gone into the ballooning capitalist profits. Capitalism is more exploitative now than it was when Engels wrote about the hideous conditions of Manchester. It just appears less so because it's far less brutal, at least in developed countries. That, and also because capitalists have devised their most sinister trick yet: loan their superprofits to the workers, to allow them to enjoy the standard of living they would have if their wages had kept pace with their productivity. The capitalists have learned to assfuck the workers from a whole new angle. Workers are having their intestines shredded by 101 angry cocks instead of just 100. But this is the fattest, longest, angriest cock of them all, with rough sandpaper skin and barbed hooks on the end. Because when the capitalists loaned too aggressively, and the workers suffered a prolapse, they pulled out all those cocks and instead tied the worker down with his ass pointing skyward and dropped a giant sequoia tree into his poor, tired, overworked sphincter from a Lear jet at 50,000 feet. The worker has no more ass to give. It's tapped.
So yes, the state should be used to punish capitalism harshly for the brutal rape of the humble worker, who only wanted to live a lifestyle he was entitled to by his incredibly generous rate of production. He did all he could think of: he charged it. I think he should get it for real this time, interest-free. Which means taking it back from the rapist who so "generously" loaned him what was rightfully his.
Quite fascinating about the A-note, actually. "I did not know that. That is some weird, wild, wacky stuff." ~Johnny Carson
I think if we're going to do the state thing, why pull at the frayed edges? Why not reply 1917 but with the critiques of e.g. Luxemburg? A properly democratic Marxist state is the only kind I could tolerate I think. Anything else will just be capitalism with frills and lace and perfume.
About worker pay. Real wages have been stagnant and falling for 30 years. Yet worker productivity has skyrocketed. The difference has gone into the ballooning capitalist profits. Capitalism is more exploitative now than it was when Engels wrote about the hideous conditions of Manchester. It just appears less so because it's far less brutal, at least in developed countries. That, and also because capitalists have devised their most sinister trick yet: loan their superprofits to the workers, to allow them to enjoy the standard of living they would have if their wages had kept pace with their productivity. The capitalists have learned to assfuck the workers from a whole new angle. Workers are having their intestines shredded by 101 angry cocks instead of just 100. But this is the fattest, longest, angriest cock of them all, with rough sandpaper skin and barbed hooks on the end. Because when the capitalists loaned too aggressively, and the workers suffered a prolapse, they pulled out all those cocks and instead tied the worker down with his ass pointing skyward and dropped a giant sequoia tree into his poor, tired, overworked sphincter from a Lear jet at 50,000 feet. The worker has no more ass to give. It's tapped.
So yes, the state should be used to punish capitalism harshly for the brutal rape of the humble worker, who only wanted to live a lifestyle he was entitled to by his incredibly generous rate of production. He did all he could think of: he charged it. I think he should get it for real this time, interest-free. Which means taking it back from the rapist who so "generously" loaned him what was rightfully his.