by judeobcsure84 » Thu Apr 28, 2005 9:02 am
you're not looking at it from a nationalist point of view. I mean what would the nazis be if they werent nationalists? internazis? The Fascists were against the anarchy in anarcho syndicalism because they thought the concept was absurd. i mean in order for the collective to work, the whole country would have to be syndicalist or they would starve competing with the non syndicalist businesses. they also disagreed that money and mass procution should be abolished because then the workers would end up like starving artists. the state would have to be brought in to make sure all the products were sold, business ran as usual and the union kept power- at gunpoint. It was a slight variation from syndicalism but its origins are still syndicalist. it was acutally more like stalinism.
you're not looking at it from a nationalist point of view. I mean what would the nazis be if they werent nationalists? internazis? The Fascists were against the anarchy in anarcho syndicalism because they thought the concept was absurd. i mean in order for the collective to work, the whole country would have to be syndicalist or they would starve competing with the non syndicalist businesses. they also disagreed that money and mass procution should be abolished because then the workers would end up like starving artists. the state would have to be brought in to make sure all the products were sold, business ran as usual and the union kept power- at gunpoint. It was a slight variation from syndicalism but its origins are still syndicalist. it was acutally more like stalinism.