[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/common.php on line 117: require(): Unable to allocate memory for pool.
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 18: include(): Unable to allocate memory for pool.
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 19: include(): Unable to allocate memory for pool.
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/session.php on line 377: include_once(): Unable to allocate memory for pool.
Anarchist Discussion Forums • View topic - anti-playboy and girl!!!!
Go to footer

Skip to content


anti-playboy and girl!!!!

Dealing with ageism, classism, sexism and other marginalizing
"isms" within the anarchist movement.

Moderators: Yarrow, Yuda, Canteloupe


Re: anti-playboy and girl!!!!

Postby Yarrow » Mon Oct 06, 2008 10:25 am

um no?

sorry, i don't understand what you're refuting marja. i'll try rereading.
User avatar
Yarrow
Denizen
 
Posts: 730
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 11:22 pm


Re: anti-playboy and girl!!!!

Postby Marja » Mon Oct 06, 2008 1:11 pm

The quote got screwed up. I was questioning your claim that:

the male of the species controls his sexual drives through the cortex (unlike the female, who uses the sex hormones)
The silver moon is set;
The Pleiades are gone;
Half the long night is spent, and yet
I lie alone.
-- Sappho
Marja
Denizen
 
Posts: 195
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 7:27 pm


Re: anti-playboy and girl!!!!

Postby Maithuna69 » Tue Oct 07, 2008 3:29 am

And how exactly do you define 'control'?

I don't 'control' my need to defacate, I only control where, when and how I act upon that need. The need itself remains hardwired into the system, like the sex drive. I control where, when and how I act upon that need, but the need remains and serves its own purpose rather than mine.
The act of disobedience as an act of freedom is the beginning of reason - Erich Fromm.
User avatar
Maithuna69
Swivel-Hips
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 3:24 am
Location: Glasgow, Scotland


Re: anti-playboy and girl!!!!

Postby Francois Tremblay » Tue Oct 07, 2008 12:51 pm

Maithuna69 wrote:I don't 'control' my need to defacate, I only control where, when and how I act upon that need. The need itself remains hardwired into the system, like the sex drive. I control where, when and how I act upon that need, but the need remains and serves its own purpose rather than mine.


Why is it not "your purpose"? Where do you draw the line between yourself and not yourself?
Left-mutualist, atheist, childfree
http://francoistremblay.wordpress.com/
User avatar
Francois Tremblay
Zen Master
 
Posts: 1555
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2008 11:52 pm


Re: anti-playboy and girl!!!!

Postby Maithuna69 » Wed Oct 08, 2008 3:18 am

Perhaps I misuse the word 'purpose'. I refer to the blind evolutionary drive of genes to perpetuate themselves within the species, something that - on a personal level - I have no will to do with my own genes. The fact that I don't want to send my genes into the future doesn't remove the capacity or 'urge' of the genes themselves to do so, nor does it mean that I don't find myself subject to the biological drives which that urge entails, even though I may have no conscious awareness of it.

For example, I recall an interesting experiment conducted - I think - in Austria, in which scientists took full-length photographs and DNA swabs from female clubbers over an extended period. By comparing the photographs with the DNA, the scientists established that without exception , the girls who were showing the most exposed flesh in their outfits were at the peak point of their fertilty cycle. Talk of 'dressing to look good' and 'I dress for myself, not for men' may be consciously true, but this individual intent doesn't cancel out the millions of years of evolution that work away in our bodies without our conscious awareness. Anyway, I feel thread-drift coming on. Let us stick to the point! :mrgreen:
The act of disobedience as an act of freedom is the beginning of reason - Erich Fromm.
User avatar
Maithuna69
Swivel-Hips
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 3:24 am
Location: Glasgow, Scotland


Re: anti-playboy and girl!!!!

Postby Yarrow » Wed Oct 08, 2008 10:27 am

control was the wrong word. i meant 'influenced by'.

but the masculine hormones (androgens) are produced in the cerebral cortex and are entirely OUT of a man's control (mental typo earlier, soz folks). female hormones (oestrogens) are produced by other hormones (the androgens, actually) and their production has been shown to be largely regulated by behaviour and other factors. a man appears to be driven to reproduce, whereas a woman has more choice in the matter. so they say.
User avatar
Yarrow
Denizen
 
Posts: 730
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 11:22 pm


Re: anti-playboy and girl!!!!

Postby Francois Tremblay » Wed Oct 08, 2008 12:38 pm

Genes have no purpose. Their only goal is to reproduce, not to reproduce the individual host. If their interest is better sought by having the host sacrifice itself for the sake of siblings, then that's what will be evolutionarily advantageous (see Hamilton's Rule).
Left-mutualist, atheist, childfree
http://francoistremblay.wordpress.com/
User avatar
Francois Tremblay
Zen Master
 
Posts: 1555
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2008 11:52 pm


Re: anti-playboy and girl!!!!

Postby Marja » Thu Oct 09, 2008 2:06 pm

Yarrow wrote:control was the wrong word. i meant 'influenced by'.

but the masculine hormones (androgens) are produced in the cerebral cortex and are entirely OUT of a man's control (mental typo earlier, soz folks). female hormones (oestrogens) are produced by other hormones (the androgens, actually) and their production has been shown to be largely regulated by behaviour and other factors. a man appears to be driven to reproduce, whereas a woman has more choice in the matter. so they say.


Testosterone production is centered in the testes and the prostate.
The silver moon is set;
The Pleiades are gone;
Half the long night is spent, and yet
I lie alone.
-- Sappho
Marja
Denizen
 
Posts: 195
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 7:27 pm


Re: anti-playboy and girl!!!!

Postby Maithuna69 » Fri Oct 10, 2008 3:22 am

Seems to me we've gone off porn and drifted into biology. New thread, anyone?
The act of disobedience as an act of freedom is the beginning of reason - Erich Fromm.
User avatar
Maithuna69
Swivel-Hips
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 3:24 am
Location: Glasgow, Scotland


Re: anti-playboy and girl!!!!

Postby Francois Tremblay » Fri Oct 10, 2008 12:42 pm

I agree.
Left-mutualist, atheist, childfree
http://francoistremblay.wordpress.com/
User avatar
Francois Tremblay
Zen Master
 
Posts: 1555
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2008 11:52 pm


Re: anti-playboy and girl!!!!

Postby Yarrow » Sat Oct 11, 2008 8:31 am

before we do tho FT, who was talking about genes?

also, DHT affects us all more strongly than testo, and is produced in the cortex. i would go on but it's a heavy subject.
User avatar
Yarrow
Denizen
 
Posts: 730
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 11:22 pm


Re: anti-playboy and girl!!!!

Postby Marja » Sat Oct 11, 2008 1:34 pm

I was just saying, if you want to contrast male sexuality with female sexuality, the biology matters. And the production of DHT depends on the amount of T. If there's little T, there can't be much DHT.

I think the contrasts are overstated.
The silver moon is set;
The Pleiades are gone;
Half the long night is spent, and yet
I lie alone.
-- Sappho
Marja
Denizen
 
Posts: 195
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 7:27 pm


Re: anti-playboy and girl!!!!

Postby Francois Tremblay » Sat Oct 11, 2008 1:55 pm

I think we should stop talking about gender altogether. The fact is, in the view that there is a gradient between what we call "male" and "female," we don't know what they mean, or why we think there is a biological difference.
Left-mutualist, atheist, childfree
http://francoistremblay.wordpress.com/
User avatar
Francois Tremblay
Zen Master
 
Posts: 1555
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2008 11:52 pm


Re: anti-playboy and girl!!!!

Postby Zazaban » Sat Oct 11, 2008 5:48 pm

Francois Tremblay wrote:I think we should stop talking about gender altogether. The fact is, in the view that there is a gradient between what we call "male" and "female," we don't know what they mean, or why we think there is a biological difference.

:D
"I am but too conscious of the fact that we are born in an age when only the dull are treated seriously, and I live in terror of not being misunderstood."
~ Oscar Wilde
"Greed in its fullest sense is the only possible basis of communist society."
~ The Right to Be Greedy
User avatar
Zazaban
Zen Master
 
Posts: 2499
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 6:00 pm


Re: anti-playboy and girl!!!!

Postby Yarrow » Sun Oct 12, 2008 11:28 pm

whilst they are 2 extremes on a scale, i think we all know the differences. how many a person exemplifies (and how many are cultural constructs) is a different question.
personally i'm not the most male of males (i'd like to think i'm quite rational, i actively enjoy thinking, how many of these points are cultural? most i think) but i have no need for pornography. it's a hard thing to resist tho. but then so are sugary treats, or a position at the top of a multinational corp (i would imagine).
willpower is the key.
User avatar
Yarrow
Denizen
 
Posts: 730
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 11:22 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Board index

Return to Anarchists Promoting Marginalisation Consciousness

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests