Satanism

[cat~maxwell]

how many of your 'komrades' think it's cool tosay 'hail satan; and show off inverted pentacles and 666 tatts at hardcore shows? the answe ris a LOT of them.

they are enemies of anarchism, youmust understand - all the bad rule of the world has Satanist -- or Luciferan, to be polite, hands in their actions, from tehdeephidden secrets of teh Bush families and their ritual magic atBohemian Grove to teh actions of Shadow GOvernment. sothe idea is that yor poseur comrades who hail Satan are not reallyanarchists -- they are damaging antiintellectual and subtling bossist contributors to the failure of anarchist direct actions around teh world. and more than a little racist.

Satanic Ritual Abuse simply is real, realand complicated. Stretching from clasified Government locales to the main streets of the nation and of course blanketed in 'plausible deniability' and incredible.

Satanic Ritual Abuse is literally ncredible -- it defies credibility because welive in a world where so many people deny the existance of God or its legendary Nemesis - and so the idea is pushed into teh world of things that are not real by those who could stand against it had they the awareness. Plausible deniability allows many GOv't sanctioned atrocities to happen.

because so many International Socialists are involved deeply in Satanic Ritual Abuse of SRA they as 'komrades' will defend their bretren in denying that such a thing happens -- even if they have not researched the past.Make no mistake that ine of the places where International Socialism and international Capitalism break bread and share a bed is the area of abduction of youth and subsequent torture. It will be those who have no alliegince to eirther philosophy -- as well as a stake in freedom and the defnese of innocence -- as well as those who long to see a world free of child abuse and rape -- who make a dent in work leading to the eradication of SRA.


meanwhile in realtime -- notce the lack of intelligent responses to this. this shows the muber of real intellectually ready anarchists thatthere are here - maybe one in twenty -- compared to dupes of international socialism.

socialism breeds fake intellectuals because moving intelleigence isn't necessary. the goal of socialism is simple -- the manifesto is meant tobe ORDERS for militant agitation.

so there's no need for intellectuals which is why Hitler chased many of them out and why Pol Pot had them killed and why castro jails any who dare speakout against him -- as well itexplains teh fscist and obviously not anarchjistic practice of censorship. if there's anything more arnarchiss than a woman's naked breasts i wanna know what it is. why can't such be shown on this website -- win the same cyberspace as unlimited ugly nasyty hardcore? because of overcompensating cryptofascism disguised as defense of wonmen's feelings.

anarchists must be on guard against that sort of fake anachy -- it's there tocontrol MINDS and actons 0-- undermining individual will in favor of a Borg like collective will which is usless -- turning the minds of many into one vebnally stupid brain cell that is only gonna do with textvb=ok precision what the manifesto SAYS it should do. it;'s not anarchism it is lurching, lemming HERD behaviro and you cantell because approaching the aorementione dresults in denial and almost VISIBLE waves of hatred. remeber -- in the german resistance during ww2 -- it was SOCIALISM that was teh target of resistance -- a resistance that only had some succes. socalism is repression -- the psychoitic mean littel sister of capitalism capable of militaristic efficencey in brurtality -- and rcist aggression. your comrades are not yoru freidns. a comrade is a war toy -- a friend is someone you can let your barriers down and bes afe. if you have wondered why scenes seme lifeless and uniform socialism is the philosophical basis. but there is more and the fake anarchists here at Flag don't want this published. well they will rot.

peopel rot. no one you know is immprtal in all probnability -- cauld live tobe forty and yet i wll inevitably rot. our fasict comrades will also rot -- but they want socialist world hegemny to seem a vision. did you notice when socialists took spain after the disaster of madrid in 03 they didn't fre all teh cops and ablish money? they didn't give anarchists any fucking credit either.



more later

cat~

[tsihcrana laicos]

Godism could be just as bad.
But who cares?

[trueness]

Go read about Satanism, Anton LeVey, and the Devil's Bible. I don't consider myself a Satanist. But most Satanists don't really worship Satan they just see him as an appropriate symbol for their moral philosophy, which is basically a form of egoism that is made to look more cool by associating it with Satan.

[Insecuritykiller]

I hate that form of satanism. Anton is a poo.

[Jake]

[bbc]http://en.wikinews..org/wiki/satanism:_an_interview_with_church_of_satan_high_priest_peter_gilmore[/bbc]

^One view of Satanism.
Anybody who says "hail Satan" is not really a Satanist but a Christian Heretic.

[lombas]

Lavey - Rand wíth religion.

[K=x'uksami]

Lavey - Rand wíth religion.

Indeed. Satanism is reactionary both politically and literally (since it basically relies on the mythos and ethos of Christianity to define itself against).

[Dimitri]

Hello this is my first post here, my normal language is dutch so please forgive me if i make any mistakes.

First of all i'm agreeing with your first sentence, at least the part where you say there are a lot of people who say "hail satan".
But i do not see them as ennemies. They still are comrades to me.
Further you say every bad rule in the world has satanic hands on it.
Which in my opinion is true. If you say to me that every satanic thougt comes from a natural instinct within man's brain. Every man will try to invent new rules to make things better for himself. That is the thing wich makes us human.

If you take a good look on satanism you'll see it isn't about worshipping some kind of deity whom's existence can be put in question. It is about knowing what we are, who you are, about not denying your true instincts. Instincts wich must be denied by the holy church. This church has more or less changed. Most of it's ideas still came from the middle ages to keep people under fear and control. Like having an affair with 2 women they scared the crap out of you by telling you'd go to hell where you will suffer eternally. But on the other hand, church brought us some manners, learned to have respect to each other. And not always to make war like wild savage beasts.

Besides there are 2 paths in satanism:
tradional and modern.
- Tradional: wich is worshipping demons and satan as a person (frequently chosen by little kids who try to impress)
- Modern: the one of laveye wich says not to deny your natural instincts.

[theeternaliam]

Did you choose those so-called "natural" instincts? Or were they "impressed" upon you by yer environment/physical ancestry. My Eternal Naure, which is Perfect and Free, is my True Nature, not lacking ever. This nature recognizes the futility of my so-called "Natural" Instincts, for I never lack. If you chose to resist yer instincts, you may notice opposition. For example, if you stand up against the wind, you can feel it's force. If you lay down, you will never know of it's force.

[Dimitri]

Did you choose those so-called "natural" instincts? Or were they "impressed" upon you by yer environment/physical ancestry. My Eternal Naure, which is Perfect and Free, is my True Nature, not lacking ever. This nature recognizes the futility of my so-called "Natural" Instincts, for I never lack. If you chose to resist yer instincts, you may notice opposition. For example, if you stand up against the wind, you can feel it's force. If you lay down, you will never know of it's force.

I have chosen for the eternal nature, the one of laveye's.
Modern satanism is almost the same as anarchism.
Only in satanism they want to go more for free instincts.
At anarchism (i think) it is more about seeing the lesser sides of some objects which can and are being misused and to try to solve them in a human way.

[Zazaban]

Truth is, Lucifer could be considered the first freedom fighter. He stood up to God's tyranny. He could easily be called an anarchist.

Also, lumping people together into one stereotyped lump because they say 'hail satan' and '666' is more than a bit lame.

[Dimitri]

Truth is, Lucifer could be considered the first freedom fighter. He stood up to God's tyranny. He could easily be called an anarchist.

Also, lumping people together into one stereotyped lump because they say 'hail satan' and '666' is more than a bit lame.

More then true, you always have some idiots who try to rebel in a lame way.

[Zazaban]

Truth is, Lucifer could be considered the first freedom fighter. He stood up to God's tyranny. He could easily be called an anarchist.

Also, lumping people together into one stereotyped lump because they say 'hail satan' and '666' is more than a bit lame.

More then true, you always have some idiots who try to rebel in a lame way.

I think you misread my post. I was saying that people who claim satanists are part of a plot to take over the world are lame, not the satanists themselves.

[Yarrow]

the satanic bible is an interesting book. personally i think the freedom to act as we want would be a great leveller, if it weren't for people gaining control over others and telling them they don't have that freedom. but in every class there is a bully and a quiet kid, and that may not ever change.

however, every other chapter is about burning babies or drinking blood. i got the impression lavey wrote his book for leaders and followers, it's like a manual for moral freedom hidden in servile and pugilistic propaganda. i really pity (and despise, and wish i could educate) those who take it literally.

of course, forcing my education upon them would make me just as bad- or would it, if my education was beneficial? i guess that's up to everyone else to decide. certainly i won't lose any sleep over it. i had that trouble- and subsequent revelation- a long time ago.

[Zazaban]

Hmmm, just read over the principles of LaVeyan Satanism, it actually sounds rather good.