Talk and Action,
the political and the armed wing of the party
Sex sells. Pornography is great advertising for sex -- so good it is taking over the market! "Child-pornography" is one of the best advertising tools the cause has.
Cp is used by the metropole as a distraction from what is cruel and bad in adult pornography: young women strangled and sexually abused -- consentually -- for a few dollars. The same dialectic is behind the systemic requirement that sex be informed and consentual, it is a diversion, a distraction, to hide the lie that informed consent is anything but free, as though half the women in the less-developed world choose freely to labour for a dollar a day in sweat shops, or as though the informed consumer has any choice except to buy Nabisco brand. Informed consent is a capitalist tool.
Cp is the single best propaganda tool girl-lovers have: Some little girls are hot. The proof is in the pudding. 99% of the time pornography is unequal, exploitative and abuse, but pedophiles make a mistake in choosing their allies too narrowly: in the revolution, anyone who is our enemy's enemy is our friend; and there could never be a better mascot for any movement than the little girl herself, and everything comely about her.
His love was obstructed and his will was inverted into a hate of society. Society also called his love hate, called his love violence. For the pedophile, when he is driven to the point of rebellion, when he reacts by reflex, he reacts with violence. Society has made the pedophile the perfect weapon: his love is his hate, his hate is his love: when the pedophile comes to revolutionary self-consciousness, he understands that the most real, most powerful tactic and weapon he has is being himself. And loving.
The pedophile remembers that the only real weapon he has, the most powerful one he has, the one that made him who he is, is his physical sexuality. When the pedophile acts individually, under personal initiative; and physically -- true to his nature -- the system is forced to use the only tactic it ever really had, and the one which most betrays its real nature: physical hate -- which can never win over love.
* * *
The system called pedophilia bad, and undid itself, creating a role-model and model of behavior for every rebel. Cp draws in any rebel-without-a-cause -- because pedophilia is bad. Cp is the only medium, besides pedophilia itself, which is genitive: self-replicating, something that can really be called a meme. No one seeks out written argumentative pedophile advocacy; it is an imposition -- cp is sought out. The rebellious counter-culture that has adopted pedophilia as part of its "bad" image is doing a great deal to legitimize pedophilia -- and spread it -- and to other out-groups and undifferentiated disenfranchised rebels.
The short term disadvantages of the acute bad press we get has long term advantages: media exposure precedes normalization. We don't need to campaign just to make a name for ourselves and to let people know who we are. A stereotyped caricature (pedo-smile, manipulative, socially inept) and the jokes that go with it have the effect of exposing their prejudice nature.
* * *
The advocate wants to change the system from within. Either the systemic neurosis can accommodate him, or it can not. The homosexual did not have to completely deconstruct the system to find his legitimacy in it. There was not per say a conflict of interest; society had so thoroughly disowned its ass that no one was going to contest the claim. For us, things are very different: "our children," the children are our future. Society is not going to give up its children so easily, witness the world-historical battle between parent and state.
The advocate is non-violent, he denies his physical existence; is he anything then but nothing? a wind of words? a cloud of high-ideals and obfuscation?
The advocate has a role in the pedophile's struggle for liberation: he must write the revolutionary tracts and poetry, he must analyze the system of oppression, he must develop our line and propaganda and deconstruct enemy propaganda. This is nothing less than building the entire ideological basis and justification for our struggle and victory.
The advocate must hold opinions consistent with his non-violence, with his physical quasi-non-existence: he must be against anything worldly: pornography, sex -- in effect: not doing anything at all. We can not blame the advocate for holding the positions he does with respect to sexuality-in-the-world or art: as advocate he must hold these positions.
Let the advocate remember however, when he plays tactics, that "a picture is worth a thousand words," and that as strong as an argument might be, existence is the highest form of truth.
Because the advocate accepts to plays the neutered role, he will sometimes escape persecution; but this is not guaranteed: the system still considers him dangerous so the metropole may have laws against his advocacy. Only the most passionate will risk their lives for their Juliet; hopefully they can say to themselves from behind prison bars: 'It would be worth it even if it meant eternity in hell.'
* * *
A little more than tweeks are required to first have a society where pedophilia would be legitimized -- legitimizing pedophilia in this society is out of the question, and to do so would only corrupt girl-love. Pedophilia won't be legitimized before something very near to wholesale destruction takes place. Pedohysteria is a neurosis; nothing less than psycotic break can crack it, the system depends on the physical world and the city planners, the cities themselves even need to come down.
* * *
In 1994, Jean-Bertrand Aristide, then president of Haiti made an angry and impassioned speech for the oppressed to rise up and attack the system. He called for them to use whatever was in their hand: a "trowel," the "constitution" or a "pen."
Every revolution has a weapon particular to its nature -- and characterization. A peasant will carry a pitchfork and sickle to the agricultural revolution. A writer will fight with his pen. A man who finds a gun in his hands will follow the war path with a Kalashnikov. In Lysistrata, women use sex as their weapon. And the pedophile? what weapon is in his hand?
This is not even a matter of 'which is mightier, the pen(is) or the sword?' or a deep question like 'this is my rifle, this is my gun' which one's for fighting and which is for fun?
Whatever is in your hand Aristide said.
What does the pedophile have in his hand?
At this point we could digress, dissolve the question, perhaps his hands are tied? or say that pedophilia isn't an essential characteristic: if he is a professional writer (advocate) his pen is in his hand; if he is a photographer (pornographer) his camera is in his hand; if he is in IT (webmaster) his laptop is in his hand...
The pedophile has his penis in his hand -- and possibly a child.
So, what is the pedophile's weapon particular to his nature? what is in his hand that he can use as a weapon? Pedo-terrorism?
More than words, what contradicts everything the anti can say?
It is the real, successful, erotic, age-discrepant, relationship.
The anti will tear those words to shreads: calling them contradictions, untrue, lies -- but the reality is --glaringly existential.
While the anti refuses to admit real evidence into the argument (and the advocate does not submit it) he can go on with his medieval scholasticism indefinately.
* * *
Advocacy gives a place in the system, albeit an awkward one. There is no "live and let live" with the system, so if one is to survive, one must have a place in the system, no matter how cowardly and in bad-faith this may seem.
The armed revolutionary who gets his hands dirty at "violence" ("abuse" and "rape") -- not with blood, but other bodily fluids -- is following the most natural line of attack for him, and the most cathartic and authentic conversion of his physical and violent oppression into his physical and "violent" emancipation.
The advocate is logically precluded from doing anything, or advocating anything, "violent." His will to live forces him to mitigate, submit, and become a shadow existence -- sub-human, a ghost, who can exist only in sarcasm, veiled threats, hypothetical and metaphorical speech.
The advocate is not saying anything if he isn't being obscene; it is just a question of how many layers of abstraction the obscenity is hidden behind. The difference between the political and armed wings of our party is a gray scale, without pure white or black at either end.
Kampong Som
2009
