The traditional spectrum, from least socialist to most socialist, is:
<br>individualist
<br>mutualist
<br>collectivist
<br>anarcho-syndicalist
<br>anarcho-communist
<br>
<br>But it could be done any number of ways, I wouldn't bother too much about classification systems. If you've read the infamous FAQ, read something else.
<br>I suggest:
<br>
<br>@
Anarchism: A History Of Libertarian Ideas And Movements - George Woodcock, 1962,1975
<br>a favorable general history
<br>
<br>@
Anarchism; From Theory to Practice - Daniel Guerin, 1965,1970
<br>more anarcho-syndicalist (originally French)
<br>
<br>@
The Anarchists - James Joll, 1964,1979
<br>like Woodcock, but shorter and more critical
<br>
<br>@
Anarchism - David Miller, 1984
<br>critical theoretical study (market socialist)
<br>
<br>@
Demanding The Impossible: A History Of Anarchism - Peter Marshall, 1992
<br>The biggest.
<br>
<br><center>[color=#8D0000][b]
<br>The democratization of the signature. Instead of dictating the signature, I let you
choose
<br>