Go to footer

Skip to content


Public sex

If you're new to Anarchism or just have a general question this is your place. Low key, no heavy theory; welcome newbies and guest posts.

Moderators: Yarrow, Yuda, Canteloupe


Re: Public sex

Postby Zazaban » Thu Sep 17, 2009 2:45 pm

Sure. I see no issue with it. You don't forbid people with horrible skin deformities from going outside, I don't see how older people doing it would be any more disturbing than seeing somebody who has been shot in the face.
"I am but too conscious of the fact that we are born in an age when only the dull are treated seriously, and I live in terror of not being misunderstood."
~ Oscar Wilde
"Greed in its fullest sense is the only possible basis of communist society."
~ The Right to Be Greedy
User avatar
Zazaban
Zen Master
 
Posts: 2499
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 6:00 pm


Re: Public sex

Postby thelastindividual » Thu Sep 17, 2009 2:48 pm

Zazaban wrote:Sure. I see no issue with it. You don't forbid people with horrible skin deformities from going outside, I don't see how older people doing it would be any more disturbing than seeing somebody who has been shot in the face.

:shock:

Well at this point I think it comes down to taste, I'm cool with people with deformities or whatever but the thought of them fucking in front of me is......disturbing, call me a conservative all you want that's just how I and quite a lot of the people on this planet feel, I don't have a problem in theory but in practice I'd probably have reservations
"Well, judging by his outlandish attire, he's some sort of free thinking anarchist." - C.M Burns

"Property is theft right? Therefore theft is property. Therefore this ship is mine" - Zaphod Beeblebrox
User avatar
thelastindividual
Zen Master
 
Posts: 1051
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 8:14 am


Re: Public sex

Postby Zazaban » Thu Sep 17, 2009 2:53 pm

As I said, not in front of you.
"I am but too conscious of the fact that we are born in an age when only the dull are treated seriously, and I live in terror of not being misunderstood."
~ Oscar Wilde
"Greed in its fullest sense is the only possible basis of communist society."
~ The Right to Be Greedy
User avatar
Zazaban
Zen Master
 
Posts: 2499
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 6:00 pm


Re: Public sex

Postby thelastindividual » Thu Sep 17, 2009 2:58 pm

Zazaban wrote:As I said, not in front of you.


I have no further objections 8)
"Well, judging by his outlandish attire, he's some sort of free thinking anarchist." - C.M Burns

"Property is theft right? Therefore theft is property. Therefore this ship is mine" - Zaphod Beeblebrox
User avatar
thelastindividual
Zen Master
 
Posts: 1051
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 8:14 am


Re: Public sex

Postby Zazaban » Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:17 pm

Generally, older people are less into that anyway.
"I am but too conscious of the fact that we are born in an age when only the dull are treated seriously, and I live in terror of not being misunderstood."
~ Oscar Wilde
"Greed in its fullest sense is the only possible basis of communist society."
~ The Right to Be Greedy
User avatar
Zazaban
Zen Master
 
Posts: 2499
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 6:00 pm


Re: Public sex

Postby patrickhenry » Thu Sep 17, 2009 8:45 pm

ok put your hands up if you want to see this in public?

already one person voted to ban :lol: I guess that answers your question.
Last edited by patrickhenry on Thu Sep 17, 2009 10:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
." It was all right to accept books from the students, but when they begin to teach you nonsense you must knock them down. They should be made to understand that the workers cause ought to be placed entirely in the hands of the workers themselves"http://www.mutualistde.webs.com
User avatar
patrickhenry
Denizen
 
Posts: 741
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:04 pm
Location: DE


Re: Public sex

Postby Jack Sprat » Thu Sep 17, 2009 9:45 pm

Hands up if you want to ban it...
Jack Sprat
 


Re: Public sex

Postby Zazaban » Fri Sep 18, 2009 2:56 am

I should point out that I'm half playing devil's advocate here. These sort of grey areas in what ought to be allowed in an anarchist society are quite interesting. In actuality, I'm having some difficulty picturing it.
"I am but too conscious of the fact that we are born in an age when only the dull are treated seriously, and I live in terror of not being misunderstood."
~ Oscar Wilde
"Greed in its fullest sense is the only possible basis of communist society."
~ The Right to Be Greedy
User avatar
Zazaban
Zen Master
 
Posts: 2499
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 6:00 pm


Re: Public sex

Postby AndyMalroes » Fri Sep 18, 2009 4:52 pm

I say go for it! Why should us young'uns get all the fun!
How long do you think we can have a free and democratic society if we insist on maintaining totalitarian systems in our companies? We must have freedom for individuals and organizations to grow and to realize their potentials.
(Delmar Landen, Head of Organisational Development at General Motors, 1981)
User avatar
AndyMalroes
Zen Master
 
Posts: 1518
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 11:19 pm
Location: Australia


Re: Public sex

Postby Bodhisattva » Fri Sep 18, 2009 11:23 pm

I've been thinking about this whole "sex in front of children thing" that seems to be a point of interest. I think watching a girl deep throat two men is one thing and two people who are "making love" another. Call me a romantic, but I see a distinguishing factor there and a child might be able to pick up on that.
"If tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy." –James Madison
User avatar
Bodhisattva
Swivel-Hips
 
Posts: 86
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 4:22 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA


Re: Public sex

Postby Zazaban » Sat Sep 19, 2009 12:56 am

Oh yes, there's a difference.
"I am but too conscious of the fact that we are born in an age when only the dull are treated seriously, and I live in terror of not being misunderstood."
~ Oscar Wilde
"Greed in its fullest sense is the only possible basis of communist society."
~ The Right to Be Greedy
User avatar
Zazaban
Zen Master
 
Posts: 2499
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 6:00 pm


Re: Public sex

Postby Guest » Sat Sep 19, 2009 12:59 am

Wait, a woman can't make love to two men at once? And oral sex isn't a legitimate part of lovemaking? Where are these notions coming from?
Guest
 


Re: Public sex

Postby Zazaban » Sat Sep 19, 2009 1:02 am

Guest wrote:Wait, a woman can't make love to two men at once? And oral sex isn't a legitimate part of lovemaking? Where are these notions coming from?

No, no. Where are you getting this from? I didn't say anything like that. The experience of 'love making' and 'lusty sex', are different. I assumed that the woman sucking on two guys fell under 'lusty sex'. There's no need for the moral outrage.
"I am but too conscious of the fact that we are born in an age when only the dull are treated seriously, and I live in terror of not being misunderstood."
~ Oscar Wilde
"Greed in its fullest sense is the only possible basis of communist society."
~ The Right to Be Greedy
User avatar
Zazaban
Zen Master
 
Posts: 2499
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 6:00 pm


Re: Public sex

Postby Guest » Sat Sep 19, 2009 1:55 am

What moral outrage? I asked a question.

Bodhisattva suspects that a child would be able to detect an intrinsic difference between: 1) a woman giving oral pleasure to two men; 2) a couple making love.

You both suggest that the former is an act of lust while the latter is an act of love. But we know that both acts can be based on either lust or love, so let's compare apples with apples...

Now we discover the implication that it's necessarily possible to distinguish between: 1) a woman giving oral pleasure to two men because she loves them; 2) a woman sucking off a couple of strangers for money to buy crack.

Ditto for the couple: are they making love, or just fucking? How does the child know? Does lovemaking emit a glowing aura around the lovers that children are able to detect?

Assuming no violence, the physical acts, and the sounds of passion, will be similar. There's no reason to believe otherwise. So what exactly is the child supposed to detect?

I'm not suggesting that children are completely dense. If a woman is being raped but doesn't want to frighten her onlooking child, she might put on a brave face; but I wouldn't be at all surprised if the child detected something in her eyes. But lusty sex isn't rape; it's good fun for all involved, and children generally aren't traumatized by adults having fun.
Guest
 


Re: Public sex

Postby Yarrow » Sat Sep 19, 2009 3:31 am

You both suggest that the former is an act of lust while the latter is an act of love. But we know that both acts can be based on either lust or love


i don't know that.
i think there's a difference between porno sex and lovemaking, a difference visible to the most untrained eye. admittedly porno has a element of coercion, but i'm sure the lustier side of ravishing would be met with cheers of 'get a room'.
User avatar
Yarrow
Denizen
 
Posts: 730
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 11:22 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Board index

Return to Anarchism 101

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest