Forbidden Truth Philosophy

[Seer Travis Truman]

I introduce discussion of Forbidden Truth philosophy.

Here is a basic overview of this philosophy :

http://www.Truthmedia.8k.com

[hawkins21]

I understand that children are hibituated to beleive certain things about their society but I do not think that the parents can be blamed completly? Are there parents that are like this? You bet but at the same time these parents had their minds cultivated a certain way so it is really hard to blame them completely for being ignorant (although I am not depriving them of responsibilty, I am saying that it is easier to say something than to do it).This can be solved if ones society goes through a radical transformation that would seek to improve the circumstances. Like children parents are a direct product of their enviroment and if what they do gets their family through the day (as means of survival) the will choose to be ignorant if it means that their family gets to eat another day.

Aristotle once said that their is no equality in any relationship except for 1: that is friendship (neitzche states the same thing in the Gay Science by stateing that the proper word for romantic love is friendshi [Robert C. Solomon states this as well])...parents are by nature authoritative to their children (this sort of authoritative relationship can be justified and with good reason). I think it is an absurd claim that soeciety gives parents the green light to be dictators and deprive children of their liberty....family life is an autonomous life(or should be) so if a parent is indeed like this it should not be the fault of the government. It is a conscious decision by the parent. I am a parent myself and I am an authoritative figure to my son but not to the point where I am a dictator. I am simply a parent and is fulfilling my duty as a parent to make sure my son is safe, has a roof over his head, food to eat and not stuck in ignorance. I see my son as my equal despite the fact that I have to be authoritative to him (once again some authortatve relationships can be justified) but from the looks of it, it seems like you want to do away with parenthood all together (sounds like plato's republic to me)..

Despite this though I love you section about how society defines what is "good" and what is "bad" based off their societal norms. and I like your account of th justice system..nice work

[Guest]

I understand that children are hibituated to beleive certain things about their society but I do not think that the parents can be blamed completly?

Ultimately, society is to be blamed. I do not suggest that there is a "responsibility" to the parents.

Are there parents that are like this? You bet but at the same time these parents had their minds cultivated a certain way so it is really hard to blame them completely for being ignorant (although I am not depriving them of responsibilty, I am saying that it is easier to say something than to do it).

Parents that behave like what? Ignorance is only one factor. There is mental derangement, and most importantly the poison container / cycle of abuse concept.

This can be solved if ones society goes through a radical transformation that would seek to improve the circumstances. Like children parents are a direct product of their enviroment and if what they do gets their family through the day (as means of survival) the will choose to be ignorant if it means that their family gets to eat another day.

I agree that society would need a radical, but also a TOTAL transformation. Nothing I have said is anything to do with getting food for the day. What are you referring to? Child abuse is nothing to do with providing food.

Aristotle once said that their is no equality in any relationship except for 1: that is friendship (neitzche states the same thing in the Gay Science by stateing that the proper word for romantic love is friendshi [Robert C. Solomon states this as well])...

That is not relevant. I would agree that barring top-level Superiors, any interaction with humans is likely to by steeped in in-equality in a lie-based society.

parents are by nature authoritative to their children (this sort of authoritative relationship can be justified and with good reason).

Wrong. The very concept of the parent is unnatural and insane.

The diseased and malevolent behaviour displayed by societally-decreed slave owners is not natural at all, and even that which is natural is no excuse for society to brutally subject children to genocidal child abuse.

You cannot justify this "relationship" at all using any sane means.

I think it is an absurd claim that soeciety gives parents the green light to be dictators and deprive children of their liberty....family life is an autonomous life(or should be) so if a parent is indeed like this it should not be the fault of the government.

That seems to contradict everything you have just said. What should not be the fault of the government?

It is a conscious decision by the parent.

What is?

but from the looks of it, it seems like you want to do away with parenthood all together (sounds like plato's republic to me)..

Exactly what does that mean? I make clear the Truth on family unit mythology at My website.

Despite this though I love you section about how society defines what is "good" and what is "bad" based off their societal norms. and I like your account of th justice system..nice work

All My work is 100% golden and brilliant Truth. The crime essay is undergoing upgrade at the moment, as it was always not what I wanted it to be.

[vaguelyhumanoid]

Seems like a weird mixture of Time Cube and the Manson Family, combined with some of our very own Francois Tremblay's anti-parenting stance.

[esspwebmaster]

Nice posts guys thanks for sharing it