Moderators: Yarrow, Yuda, Canteloupe
frankzappa wrote:Anarchism as a word may well describe any system other than the elite may prescribe to. In practice Bakunin and your other heroes were masons who were quids in with lenin. Now largely concentrated within the big cities, totally interdependent (in to the pen the ant) with the state - the anarchists (those that make an arc) have no social values worth defending.
They are unequivocal regarding defending homosexuality when all evidence points to the negative effects of such lifestyles (low life expectancy due to disease, high rate of suicide, highest murder rate and accidental death rate amongst partners).
They are unequivocal regarding defending black and asian youth when most with a pair of eyes can tell the culture the minorities have embraced (pimping, drug dealing, peadophilia and gangsterism) has been created by the establishment and encouraged to prosper.
They are unequivocal regarding defending womens rights when all evidence points to a culture rampant with anti white male discrimination.
They are unequivocal regarding thier silence on freemasonry, when all evidence points to the vast majority of revolutionary movements being a creation of the brotherhood.
They are all chronic alcoholics but they couldnt organise a piss up in a brewery.
They have adapted to the technological revolution seamlessly as it enables them to spend even more time sat around on thier arses posting rubbish, and uploading infantile 'Anti Fascist Action' videos to youtube (little different to getting a hard on from watching happy slapping videos or snuff movies) At the same time never being aware they are providing the elite all the information they need regarding thier thorough state of decrepancy.
They use masonic symbols for thier banners and logos without having the slightest clue what they mean (black pentagram - mason sun, skull and cross bones - battle flag of knights templars)
They talk about class war in the uk when the working class is almost exclusivley based in china and india.
They would attack the marxists though never prepared to admit they have always thrived from the titbits which fell from the maxist table, now the marxist table has collapsed they are starved to death.
frankzappa wrote:Anarchism as a word may well describe any system other than the elite may prescribe to. In practice Bakunin and your other heroes were masons who were quids in with lenin.
Now largely concentrated within the big cities, totally interdependent (in to the pen the ant) with the state - the anarchists (those that make an arc) have no social values worth defending.
They are unequivocal regarding defending homosexuality when all evidence points to the negative effects of such lifestyles (low life expectancy due to disease, high rate of suicide, highest murder rate and accidental death rate amongst partners).
They are unequivocal regarding defending black and asian youth when most with a pair of eyes can tell the culture the minorities have embraced (pimping, drug dealing, peadophilia and gangsterism) has been created by the establishment and encouraged to prosper.
They are unequivocal regarding defending womens rights when all evidence points to a culture rampant with anti white male discrimination.
They are unequivocal regarding thier silence on freemasonry, when all evidence points to the vast majority of revolutionary movements being a creation of the brotherhood.
They are all chronic alcoholics but they couldnt organise a piss up in a brewery.
They have adapted to the technological revolution seamlessly as it enables them to spend even more time sat around on thier arses posting rubbish, and uploading infantile 'Anti Fascist Action' videos to youtube (little different to getting a hard on from watching happy slapping videos or snuff movies) At the same time never being aware they are providing the elite all the information they need regarding thier thorough state of decrepancy.
They use masonic symbols for thier banners and logos without having the slightest clue what they mean (black pentagram - mason sun, skull and cross bones - battle flag of knights templars)
They talk about class war in the uk when the working class is almost exclusivley based in china and india.
They would attack the marxists though never prepared to admit they have always thrived from the titbits which fell from the maxist table, now the marxist table has collapsed they are starved to death.
At the forth congress of the bolsheviks in 1922 freemasonry was outlawed. Masons like Kerensky all flew the coup to france in good time. Similarly francos fascist republic outlawed freemasonry in its fight against the masonic popular front. It is well known that hitler did the same. There certainly seems to be a relationship between the lower level masons who do the dirty work on the ground in both stirring revolution, creating hatred towards themselves (through thier greed, corruption and perversion) and then being the first to get thier heads on the block when the shit hits the fan. Yet for the blue lodgers the dubious perks of screwing prostitutes and keeping thier businesses ticking over is enough to keep them happy and they will always be the first to rush to the defence when we attack masonry!
On the evening of June 27, 1969 the “gay rights” movement officially adopted terrorism as a means to achieve power when a surly mob of “drag queens, dykes, street people, and bar boys” physically attacked police officers conducting a “raid” on the Stonewall Bar on Christopher Street in New York.

Return to Criticisms of Anarchism
Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 3 guests