Anarchist Discussion Forums

by **playboy_bunny** » Tue Sep 08, 2009 2:56 am

If theres no governemnt, wouldn't that mean no elections, and therefore the country would be run as a dictatorship. thats why anarchys wrong/

by **thelastindividual** » Tue Sep 08, 2009 3:56 am

I think my IQ just dropped several points after reading this

by **Zazaban** » Tue Sep 08, 2009 4:04 am

Good thing you didn't read the other one, it makes even less sense.

by **thelastindividual** » Tue Sep 08, 2009 4:08 am

Zazaban wrote:Good thing you didn't read the other one, it makes even less sense.

Too late

by **Guest** » Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:26 am

i bet u cant argue it

by **thelastindividual** » Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:34 am

Guest wrote:i bet u cant argue it

Yes I can. If there's no government their can't be a dictatorship you moron

by **playboy_bunny** » Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:38 am

no but if theres no government whos going 2 stop a dictator from taking over the country he can just take over

by **thelastindividual** » Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:40 am

playboy_bunny wrote:no but if theres no government whos going 2 stop a dictator from taking over the country he can just take over

People will start community militia's, defence organisations etc

by **Guest** » Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:41 am

how will that do nething bcuz if a dictator makes the law he can just make those ilegal

by **thelastindividual** » Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:46 am

Guest wrote:how will that do nething bcuz if a dictator makes the law he can just make those ilegal

I don't think you understand. Government's cannot just arbitrarily make rules and expect people to follow them. There isn't some magical power that forces you to follow the rules. A dictator would need people to follow them, carry out their ideas and enforce their rules. It's doubtful that after a popular anarchist revolution people would suddenly turn around and decide to go along with what some random nutjob says

by **playboy_bunny** » Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:49 am

ya but if he owns the government ppl have to listen bcuz he controls the police n the millitary

by **thelastindividual** » Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:59 am

playboy_bunny wrote:ya but if he owns the government ppl have to listen bcuz he controls the police n the millitary

But there won't be a centralised police or military

by **playboy_bunny** » Tue Sep 08, 2009 7:00 am

y not

by **thelastindividual** » Tue Sep 08, 2009 7:01 am

playboy_bunny wrote:y not

Because those structures will have been dismantled and replaced with defence organisations/communla militia's based on voluntary co-operation

by **Guest** » Tue Sep 08, 2009 7:02 am

ya but y would sumbody voluntaly coperate, bcuz wouldnt ppl just fight n steal bxcuz look at somalia thats anarchy its chaos

Anarchist Discussion Forums

dictatorship

dictatorship

Re: dictatorship

Re: dictatorship

Re: dictatorship

Re: dictatorship

Re: dictatorship

Re: dictatorship

Re: dictatorship

Re: dictatorship

Re: dictatorship

Re: dictatorship

Re: dictatorship

Re: dictatorship

Re: dictatorship

Re: dictatorship

Who is online