by |Y| » Sun Nov 16, 2003 2:11 am
I don't see how it's similar, honestly. Chiggens had proved his blatent dishonesty. Indeed, he even useses his alternate ego in this very thread, to back up himself. It's rather pathetic.
<br>
<br>This is not to say that that's the end of that, but it does beg the question, if our only source is a dishonest bastard, how, praytell, are we going to know if what is being said is true? We need a second, or third, or fourth source to know that in fact the information is true.
<br>
<br>No one is blockaiding chiggins, if anything it's the converse, since he's spreading disinformation in an attempt to befuddle.
<br>
<br>Really, all we ask is for a verification.
<br>
<br>Most so called anarchists, in my experience, are not anarchists.
<br>
<br>I think Ayn Rand has made the best arguments for socialism/anarchism ever. You see what she writes and realize how ridiculous it all sounds, so the exact opposite must be the better alternative.
I am a leader, but you will not follow me.