Go to footer

Skip to content


Philosophical anarchism, mk 2

Anarchism: What it is and what it is not.

Moderators: Yarrow, Yuda, Canteloupe

Where does your belief in anarchism come from?

You may select up to 9 options

 
 
View results


Re: Philosophical anarchism, mk 2

Postby spawn » Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:16 pm

racist fucker wrote:what fucking lies. you have, right here on this forum, people who are celebrated as "israeli anarchists" who live on kibbutzim built on the graves of the people they murdered in order to clear the land of people they did not desire to live with.

did you say to any of them "Go back to stormfront?" somehow, i doubt it.

but when a White person says that he or she would like to live in anarchy JUST LIKE YOUR ANARCHIST FRIENDS IN ISRAEL then, all of a sudden, we're "nationalists" who support "hierarchies."

what total fucking hypocrites you are.

Being born in IsraHell is not something you can blame anyone for.
However, my extreme nationalist and militaristic government should be condemned. (so should the Hamas, though)
Anarchism cannot go hand in hand with racism.

But you know what, living in the zionist murder machine I can feel ya. I guess you're not a nationalist after all, anarchonationalist.
We're cool.
"Every State is a despotism, be the despot one or many" -- Max Stirner
User avatar
spawn
Swivel-Hips
 
Posts: 43
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 10:41 am
Location: Jerusalem, the unholy land


Re: Philosophical anarchism, mk 2

Postby Guest » Tue Jul 07, 2009 10:37 pm

really, i dont see what your objection is, noleaders.

i didnt see any reaction from you when people support israel on this board. israelis are proud people who dont want to live with arabs. they defy world government to make a world of their own - a triumph of their wills over the global state. aside from some quacking leftists i don't see anyone complaining about anarchists who support israel.

then why do you have such a fear reaction to the idea that some of us want to live with white people only? if that's what we want, who are you (or any state) to say we cant have it?

certain people get very upset at the word nigger, but i don't see them losing any sleep over the terrorists in gaza getting what was coming to them. the fact is that palestinians are lesser to jews and blacks are lesser to whites? how do we know this? look around!

i dont want to kill niggers or wetbacks. i just want them to leave us alone. some of them feel the same way. and we wouldn't stop you from mixing with whatever mud people you wanted to mix with. it's just not what we want.

i still dont understand why my IP was banned from this forum. i see at least one long term member expressing similar views. why was I banned while he is allowed to stay?
Guest
 


Re: Philosophical anarchism, mk 2

Postby Insecuritykiller » Wed Jul 08, 2009 1:07 am

I was a little wussy boy against racism aswell once upon a time. That's when i started writeing on this forum.

Since then i've been opening peoples minds. In amazeing ways.

It's the eve of the revolution.

KILL! KILL! KILL! KILL! KILL! KILL! KILL! KILL!
TAKE WHAT IS YOURS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Insecuritykiller
Zen Master
 
Posts: 2164
Joined: Thu May 08, 2003 6:57 pm
Location: Australia


Re: Philosophical anarchism, mk 2

Postby Yarrow » Wed Jul 08, 2009 5:42 am

define 'nigger'

define 'wetback'

the fact is that palestinians are lesser to jews and blacks are lesser to whites?


and vice versa, to certain people (your example and mine).
User avatar
Yarrow
Denizen
 
Posts: 730
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 11:22 pm


Re: Philosophical anarchism, mk 2

Postby Noleaders » Wed Jul 08, 2009 11:14 am

really, i dont see what your objection is, noleaders.


My objection is to people trying to co-opt and derail this ideology with their own nonsense. I mean its not like were debating economic systems here, anarchy means No(an) - Rulers(arkos) and is fundamentally against aggression whereas "national anarchists" and the like completely ignore this and use pluralism to sneak in all kinds of authoritarian social values.

i didnt see any reaction from you when people support israel on this board.


I challenge you to find one quote from me involving israel, or any evidence i was on any thread involving israel. For the record i think the support shown is probably just something to do with the israeli kibbutzim as an economic system.

israelis are proud people who dont want to live with arabs. they defy world government to make a world of their own - a triumph of their wills over the global state.


No its just religious people killing each other, there's nothing to be proud of

aside from some quacking leftists i don't see anyone complaining about anarchists who support israel.


Ok well i'll start. Anarchists shouldnt support israel!

Happy

How does this make you any less daft anyway?

then why do you have such a fear reaction to the idea that some of us want to live with white people only?


Cos you dont have any right over your neighbours and you force them to move if you dont like them, thats the point of anarchism, if you really want to live in an all white area then you are all free to move somewhere with no population at all so as to avoid aggressing against anyone in the process, may i suggest siberia? no black people there.

if that's what we want, who are you (or any state) to say we cant have it?


Have it if you like, but make sure no coercion is involved.

how about the siberia suggestion? Sahara desert is pretty empty too, there's probably lots of places you could go if you put your mind to it.

certain people get very upset at the word nigger, but i don't see them losing any sleep over the terrorists in gaza getting what was coming to them.


Im pretty sure everyone here is against terrorism, its just none come here supporting them so why would we bring it up?

the fact is that palestinians are lesser to jews and blacks are lesser to whites? how do we know this? look around!


I am, ive usually found racists to have a distinctly inbred look about them. Of course in an all white area the population would be full of inbreds before long so maybe you think thats a good thing.

i dont want to kill niggers or wetbacks. i just want them to leave us alone.


How can they leave you alone if there not aggressing against you in anyway?

and we wouldn't stop you from mixing with whatever mud people you wanted to mix with. it's just not what we want.


So? Coercion doesnt just become ok when its excused by pluralism, in fact surely such pluralism should disprove the daft notions that make up racist ideology.

i still dont understand why my IP was banned from this forum. i see at least one long term member expressing similar views. why was I banned while he is allowed to stay?
really, i dont see what your objection is, noleaders.

i didnt see any reaction from you when people support israel on this board. israelis are proud people who dont want to live with arabs. they defy world government to make a world of their own - a triumph of their wills over the global state. aside from some quacking leftists i don't see anyone complaining about anarchists who support israel.

then why do you have such a fear reaction to the idea that some of us want to live with white people only? if that's what we want, who are you (or any state) to say we cant have it?

certain people get very upset at the word nigger, but i don't see them losing any sleep over the terrorists in gaza getting what was coming to them. the fact is that palestinians are lesser to jews and blacks are lesser to whites? how do we know this? look around!

i dont want to kill niggers or wetbacks. i just want them to leave us alone. some of them feel the same way. and we wouldn't stop you from mixing with whatever mud people you wanted to mix with. it's just not what we want.

i still dont understand why my IP was banned from this forum. i see at least one long term member expressing similar views. why was I banned while he is allowed to stay?


Actually this is something i agree with, the mod's should let people speak. If they're reading this, stop being so statist!
The Anarchists are simply unterrified Jeffersonian Democrats. They believe that 'the best government is that which governs least,' and that which governs least is no government at all.
User avatar
Noleaders
Zen Master
 
Posts: 1187
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 7:19 pm


Re: Philosophical anarchism, mk 2

Postby Francois Tremblay » Wed Jul 08, 2009 1:00 pm

Let me guess, retro-nazi, you're an American right? Because we can see your American ignorance seeping through every pore.
Left-mutualist, atheist, childfree
http://francoistremblay.wordpress.com/
User avatar
Francois Tremblay
Zen Master
 
Posts: 1555
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2008 11:52 pm


Re: Philosophical anarchism, mk 2

Postby |Y| » Thu Jul 09, 2009 2:04 am

What made ambi crack?
I am a leader, but you will not follow me.
User avatar
|Y|
One Step Beyond
 
Posts: 5737
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2003 1:16 am
Location: The Americas


Re: Philosophical anarchism, mk 2

Postby Zazaban » Thu Jul 09, 2009 2:08 am

|Y| wrote:What made ambi crack?

Hmm, you think that's ambi?
"I am but too conscious of the fact that we are born in an age when only the dull are treated seriously, and I live in terror of not being misunderstood."
~ Oscar Wilde
"Greed in its fullest sense is the only possible basis of communist society."
~ The Right to Be Greedy
User avatar
Zazaban
Zen Master
 
Posts: 2499
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 6:00 pm


Re: Philosophical anarchism, mk 2

Postby |Y| » Thu Jul 09, 2009 2:21 am

:lol:

Probably not. But close enough for me to make the statement, which was in jest.
I am a leader, but you will not follow me.
User avatar
|Y|
One Step Beyond
 
Posts: 5737
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2003 1:16 am
Location: The Americas


Re: Philosophical anarchism, mk 2

Postby jack » Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:49 pm

Erm, class struggle? Lots of petit bourgeois thought in this thread.
User avatar
jack
Denizen
 
Posts: 610
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 10:48 pm


Re: Philosophical anarchism, mk 2

Postby Francois Tremblay » Tue Jul 21, 2009 12:58 am

jack wrote:Lots of petit bourgeois thought in this thread.


What does that even mean?
Left-mutualist, atheist, childfree
http://francoistremblay.wordpress.com/
User avatar
Francois Tremblay
Zen Master
 
Posts: 1555
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2008 11:52 pm


Re: Philosophical anarchism, mk 2

Postby thelastindividual » Tue Jul 21, 2009 6:08 am

Francois Tremblay wrote:
jack wrote:Lots of petit bourgeois thought in this thread.


What does that even mean?
It depends

If your name is Karl Marx and you have a colleague called Engels then it means a member of the working classes who by virtue of his craft has access to some parts of Bourgeois society

If your one of the idiots who likes to think they are fulfilling the vision of marx it just means 'scum' (Actually it's usually meant to mean the middle classes to the best of my understanding)
"Well, judging by his outlandish attire, he's some sort of free thinking anarchist." - C.M Burns

"Property is theft right? Therefore theft is property. Therefore this ship is mine" - Zaphod Beeblebrox
User avatar
thelastindividual
Zen Master
 
Posts: 1051
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 8:14 am


Re: Philosophical anarchism, mk 2

Postby Francois Tremblay » Tue Jul 21, 2009 1:22 pm

Thanks for the translation.
Left-mutualist, atheist, childfree
http://francoistremblay.wordpress.com/
User avatar
Francois Tremblay
Zen Master
 
Posts: 1555
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2008 11:52 pm


Re: Philosophical anarchism, mk 2

Postby Zazaban » Tue Jul 21, 2009 1:28 pm

jack wrote:Erm, class struggle? Lots of petit bourgeois thought in this thread.

This kind of class struggle elitism is annoying. Blacklisting anything unrelated to blue collar labour organization as 'bourgeois' is worse.
"I am but too conscious of the fact that we are born in an age when only the dull are treated seriously, and I live in terror of not being misunderstood."
~ Oscar Wilde
"Greed in its fullest sense is the only possible basis of communist society."
~ The Right to Be Greedy
User avatar
Zazaban
Zen Master
 
Posts: 2499
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 6:00 pm


Re: Philosophical anarchism, mk 2

Postby Noleaders » Tue Jul 21, 2009 4:34 pm

jack wrote:Erm, class struggle? Lots of petit bourgeois thought in this thread.


Lots of ad hominum in this sentance.
The Anarchists are simply unterrified Jeffersonian Democrats. They believe that 'the best government is that which governs least,' and that which governs least is no government at all.
User avatar
Noleaders
Zen Master
 
Posts: 1187
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 7:19 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Board index

Return to Anarchists and Anarchism

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 1 guest