Freemasonry and anarchism

[jack]

I'm a freemason.

[frankzappa]

"Stopped reading after you called capitalism an abstraction. The mode of production is a material reality. I'm constantly on my toes on the lookout for reification, so don't presume to catch me out on that front, you loonytune.

You go ahead and stay on the alert for seekrit handshakes and men warming their hands between the buttons of their coats. The oppressed peoples of the world appreciate your efforts."

Capitalism is the acts and works of man and woe (of) man. It is abstract in saying that you wish to fight ‘Capitalism’ as it is as vauge as some of you desire ‘socialism’. What definitions of capitalism would you like to fall back on other than those defined by people who never did a days work in their lives ie all the ‘professional’ revolutionairies? The power that rests behind the paper money system I have already defined, ie ‘all the traditional forces supporting the state’

“In so far as Gramsci defined freemasonry as ‘all the traditional forces supporting the state’, I take this as all the forces masonry encompass, not only Finance, Industry and Capital, Military, Police, Health Authority, Housing, Agriculture, Education, Court systems, Utilities etc etc etc but also refers to the involvement of ‘functionaries, managers and bureaucrats’ i.e. the middle class in its role of management of the system. It also refers to large portions of the working and underclasses i.e. gangsters, pimps, trade-unionists etc etc”

With capitalism, the difference being what could be termed as the state and ‘private’ capital in this day and age, and in most times has always been very slight, in Stalin’s Russia the two were completely merged. All, if you remember, under the banner of a fight against ‘capitalism’. Such an ideology leads one to advocacy of destruction of all forms of free enterprise in that they represent a threat to the fascist Masonic state. Millions of self sustaining peasants were wiped out. In the ‘commie’ scheme of things any self sustaining person, especially those who employ persons outside of the notice and blessing of the state could only be considered capitalist. Both from an economic and psychological standpoint.

Freemasonry is a far superior term to capitalism, being that if we could remove the former we might open the possibility of self determination for humanity for the first time and true anarchism as some of you call it may have a chance. Banging on about ‘capitalism’ makes about as much sense as running around trying to convince everyone of the necessity for ‘socialism’. I spent a good many years of my youth doing the same things but I am a lot older and wiser nowadays.

[frankzappa]

To suggest that the “Anglo American establishment” centered around the RHODES foundation in OXF-ORD, most commonly associated with Lord Milners “The Milner Group”, was somehow above freemasonry or disconnected from it, is wrong. This sentiment has been expressed repeatedly by many. It would appear to be a very important point concerning many patriot broadcasters ability in going the whole hog and coming out of the closet against freemasonry. That the Milner group in liason with the Wall street conspirators (as described by Antony Sutton) were behind every major social upheaval modern times is largely beyond dispute. That this group is centered around, co-ordinated with, and ultimately subordinate to freemasonry is much less clearly established.

A glimpse of the interconnected nature of freemasonry and the Anglo American establishment can be found in “The history of the Royal commonwealth society 1868 - 1968” Trevor R.Reese, Oxford University Press 1968 read in conjunction with professor Carroll Quigley’s “The anglo-american establishment .

Lord Grey is a particularly interesting example. Quigley spares no expense in underlining Grey’s influence in the formation of the Milner group and his role of Godfather of ‘the group’ in its early years.

“Grey became administrator of Rhodesia when Dr. Jameson was forced to resign from that post in 1896 as an aftermath of his famous raid into the Transvaal. He was Governor-General of Canada in 1904 – 1911 and unveiled the Rhodes Memorial in South Africa in 1912. A liberal member of the House of Commons from 1880 to 1886, he was defeated as a unionist in the later year. In 1894 he entered the House of Lords as the fourth Earl Grey, having inherited the title and 17,600 acres from an uncle. Throughout this period he was close to Milner and later was very useful in providing practical experience for various members of the Milner Group. His son, the future fifth Earl Grey, married the daughter of the second Earl of Selborne, a member of the Milner Group” Caroll Quigley, The Anglo American Establishment.

Grey was a very busy boy indeed, and not only amongst the Milner Group, or as a black market banker as Sutton mentions, but also I would venture, as a freemason. The Duke of Connaught (Prince Albert) was the Grandmaster of freemasonry of England at this time. The 4th Earl Grey and the Duke of Connaught interchanged roles as governor general of Canada and Director of the Royal Commonwealth society also known as the Royal Colonial Institute. Such job swapping indicates a high level of cross co-ordination at the highest ranks of international government, royalty and banking. Freemasonry very obviously plays a very big if not domineering role in this picture.

Regarding the growth of the Royal Commonwealth society:

“The membership campaign was helped in a small way by the practice begun in 1909 of admitting all Rhodes scholars to honorary membership during their time in residence at Oxford, and by the grant of reciprocal concessions to members of other societies with which the institute agreed to affiliate, notably the Empire Club of Canada in 1911 and the Malta Association in 1912. A more significant development would have been the establishment of a formal connection with the undergraduate Ralegh Club, which was inaugurated at Oxford in 1913 by Milner and James Allen and met to discuss imperial questions: Jebb and Egerton toyed with the idea of creating an institute branch out of the club, but nothing came out of it……..The membership campaign was also assisted by the formation in 1912 of a masonic lodge ‘for the purpose of enhancing the ties of Empire and Craft and as an additional bond between the resident and non-resident fellows and members’. The first grand master of the lodge was the grand master, the Duke of Connaught, governer general of Canada and a former president of the institute…The freemasons at the institute grew steadily in strength and the Royal Colonial Institute lodge formed in 1912 was added to, until by 1924 there were a United Empire lodge, a Mark Lodge, a Royal Arch and Rose Croix Chapters”. P105, 138 The History of the Royal Commonwealth Society 1868 – 1968, Trevor R Reese, Oxford University Press, 1968.

[frankzappa]

Please take the time to listen to Alans most recent broadcast.

Dec. 14, 2009
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Controllers Use and Select, Psychopathic Social Reject:
"Planned Destruction of Societies Well Under Way,
Promoters of Radical Change, Only Ones with a Say,
T.V. Addicts Suck the Teat of Degradation,
Unconscious of Methods of Mass-Persuasion,
Zoologists and Anthropologists Create Human Zoo,
Advising Think-Tanks What/How to Do,
With Behaviourists, Academia Tries Each Quiet Experiment
To Manipulate Behaviour, All to Our Detriment,
Most Think We Arrived Here by Folly or Fate,
Yet Techniques Implemented by Planners Who Hate"

***Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Dec. 14, 2009 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
***LISTEN / DOWNLOAD
http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com/ ... 142009.mp3

Topics of show covered in following links:

Child Sex Trafficking in UK
("Barnardo's warns of Britain's secret trade in child sex " by Nico Hines (timesonline.co.uk) - Nov. 18, 2009.)

Gene Gender Switch Claimed to be Found
("Scientists find single 'on-off' gene that can change gender traits" by Hannah Devlin (timesonline.co.uk) - Dec. 11, 2009.)

Kevin Jennings appointed Obama's Safe School Czar-See What He Advocates
( (gatewaypundit.firstthings.com) - Dec. 9, 2009.)

[frankzappa]

My apologies, the Duke of Connaught was prince Arthur, not prince Albert as I stated in my previous post.

[frankzappa]

A broken shoulder prevented me from writing sooner. More to follow on October 1917.

S is 5, when spoken S is es. Es is 5 + 1 = 6. So the pronunciation of S (5) gives a numerical value of 6. Crowley spoke that both were essentially the same number and veils for the number 666 as I mentioned earlier. SEX is the essence of eX or X. X represents the sim-baal of the new man to come (as Mr. Watt stated), also the earliest known sun sim-baal, totem and signifier of chief. From Sex we get xes, xces, excess or the CESS of X.

P or p is a hangman’s noose as worn by masons during initiation. The high level freemason Manly P.Hall (supposedly initiated directly into the 33rd degree without having to mess around in the lower degrees) had one of the most hilarious Masonic names of all time. Manly as in Men only (masons), P as in having a noose around your neck, and the Hall as in the Masonic hall the initiation ceremony is conducted.

55 (masonic death) is the sum of the numbers one to ten (net) added together and is, as mentioned earlier, also SS as in the Waffen SS, but much much older. An interesting earlier example of the SS insignia can be found in its use on Livery Collars.

“The famous but emblematic collar of esses (usually written SS) is of obscure origin. A chain of links each in the form of the letter S, it was probably given as livery by ‘time honored Lancaster’ , John of Gaunt (1340 – 99), and by Henry Bolingbroke who distributed 192 collars of SS among his retainers following his return from exile in 1399. As Henry IV, Bolingbroke later determined that ‘all the sons of the king, dukes, earls, barons … might use the livery of our lord the king of his collar as well in his absence as in his presence; and all other knights and esquires should use it only in the presence of the King.’ He also used a device of linked esses as a personal badge (this appears in the effigy of his queen at Canterbury) and it has been suggested that both badge and collar alluded to the initial letter of his motto ‘Sovereygne’.

The collar of SS remained a Lancastrian device for over 50 years and was adopted by the Tudors who alternated the Lancastrian SS with Beaufort portcullises and added a Tudor Rose or portcullis as a pendant. Tudor SS collars were generally more substantial and were essentially chains of office…. Today the collar is worn by kings of arms, heralds and Sergeant’s at arms and, in modified form, by the Lord chief justice and the Lord Mayor of London” (P62, Stephen Friar and John Fergusson, Basic Heraldry, The Herbert Press, 1993)

[frankzappa]

Cartoon by Robert Minor in St. Louis Post-Dispatch (1911). Karl Marx surrounded by an appreciative audience of wall street financiers: John D. Rockerfeller, J. P. Morgan, John D. Ryan of National City Bank, and Morgan Partner George W Perkins. Immediately behind Karl Marx is Teddy Rosevelt, Leader of the Progressive Party. Intro Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, Arlington House Publishing 1974.

Why write about Russia and the Russian revolution nearly 100 years after? Because the socialist nightmare of October 1917 looks set to consolidate almost a hundred years later on a worldwide scale. The October revolution of 1917 was the biggest organized con of all time. A thoroughly necessary counterpart to the American revolution of over a hundred years earlier. As Alan Watt observed and has commented several times, America and the USSR played the Role of thesis and antithesis, with the synthesis (conclusion - collusion of the con) being a form of society which brings together the worst elements of both systems - exactly what we experience today.

Two sources are of primary importance to the study of the Bolshevik revolution. Antony Suttons Wall street and the Bolshevik revolution and Western Technology and Soviet Economic development. Sutton was kicked out of the Hoover research institute when the import of his works on Russia hit home. He later went on to expose Hitler’s ties to the Anglo American establishment, he launched into George bush senior as a murdering drug dealer, also skull and bones - the elite Yale branch of freemasonry, and much more. His works are becoming rare and are very unlikely to come back into print so buy them while you can.

The primary motivating force in the Russian revolution was international capital. Russia had been overturned piece by piece, and the transition from czarist power to socialist Russia was most certainly not undertaken overnight.
The communists and ‘progressive elements’ were thoroughly intertwined with Masonry. Trotsky and Kerensky (and Kropotkin) were RBH Lockhearts boys, Lockheart was working under direct orders from Lord Milner (the head of the RHODE foundation in Oxf-ord). Lord Grey (G – ray, line of influence of G) acted as a black market banker for Bolshevik funds. Gray was also linked to Olaf Aschberg another New York ‘Bolshevik banker’

International masonry had plans to industrialize Russia, to utterly subjugate its populace and to open its doors to foreign capital. Germany (another key player in October 1917), located so close to Russia always had an interest in doing this, and funded Lenin extensively to this end, as did London.

The simple fact is that love or hate him, Trotsky was the ‘Sword of the revolution’ as Antony Cliff would put it. Lenin laid the basis for the theoretical foundation of bolshevism, Trotsky carried the revolution through. There is ample evidence to support this claim. Trotsky, a most ardent student of the bloody French revolution, played an utterly crucial role in liaison with international capital, with agitation, as a propagandist, as the leader of workers revolts and organizations and as the commander of the red army. Without Trotsky (the rot scheme) Red Russia would have failed in its tracks, and its military defence would have been nothing. Sutton exposes the simple fact that without American intervention see ‘Woodrow Wilson and a passport for Trotsky’, Trotsky would have remained incarcerated throughout the period of the Russian Revolution. Sutton also exposes the fact that prior to the revolution, during a short exile to the US that Trotsky had sources of funds in America to fund his lavish lifestyle in New York.

Around this time Wall Street motivated enormous financial resource pre and post October 1917 in support of soviet Russia. On the brink of the October revolution America sent the most bizarre Red Cross mission to the USSR.

“In August 1917 the American Red Cross Mission to Russia had only a nominal relationship with the American Red Cross, and must truly have been the most unusual Red Cross mission in history. All expenses, including those of the uniforms – the members were all colonels, majors, captains, or lieutenants – were paid out of the pocket of William Boyce Thompson.”

“The majority of the mission was made up of lawyers, financiers, and their assistants, from the New York financial district. The mission was financed by William B Thompson, described in the official red cross circular as “Commissioner and Business manager; director of United States Federal Reserve of New York.”

“The American Red Cross mission (or perhaps we should call if the Wall Street Mission to Russia) also employed three Russian-English interpreters: Captain Iloaisky, a Russian Bolshevik; Boris Reinstein, a Russian American, later secretary to Lenin, and the head of Karl Radeks Bureau Of International Revolutionary Propaganda, which also employed John Reed and Albert Rhys Williams; and Alexander Gumberg (alias Berg, real name Michael Gruzenberg , who was brother of Zorin, a Bolshevik minister. Gumberg was also the chief Bolshevik agent in Scandinavia. He later became confidential assistant to Floyd Odlum of Atlas Corporation in the United States as well as an advisor to Reeve Schley, a vice president of the Chase Bank.” P74-78, Antony Sutton, Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, Arlington House Publishing 1974.

So way in Advance of October 1917 Anglo American interests established common ground with Bolsheviks, the Red Cross mission and Trotsky’s exile are two of the most readily available examples to quote, the ties go on forever. Thompson went on to channel millions in funds to Bolshevik hands primarily through J.P Mogan Chase bank and associated interests. As Sutton mentions the Red Cross mission was concerned largely ‘with political internal maneuvering within Russia'.

The transition to the Duma to the provisional government of Kerensky to communism was a thoroughly international Masonic affair. The revolution was co-ordinated and conceived on many levels, both on a level of conspiratorial ground level agitation as the Red Cross mission, and more importantly the deliberate engineering of Russia’s political climate of the time forced the bulk of the populace into no choice other than revolution.

The mason Stolypin, government representative of the Duma who stirred tensions between peasants and workers is pictured below displaying the Masonic hidden master of the 7th Veil, Stolypin gave way to Kerensky, another mason pictured below, who in turn gave way to Trotsky pictured thrice times below. Still entertaining notions of hand warming and abdominal relief? It is the hidden hand of international freemasonry which has always guided the history of every nation worldwide.


Taken from 'A Pictorial History of the Russian Revolution'

Taken from 'A Pictorial History of the Russian Revolution'

Taken from 'Trotsky - A Documentary'

Taken from 'Trotsky - A Documentary'


The period of 1918-1921 was one of famine, war and the politics of the jackboot. Remember this need not necessarily have been the case, as much as a war of self defence and offense with other imperial powers, Russia was engaged in civil war at home. As I stated earlier, the reds captured then released all the major white generals. The reds initially established an almost bloodless coup.

"Bolshevik social programs could never been forced though without the civil war in Russia post October 1917. The following proves to some degree, the necessity of war to communism. It is some stretch of belief to presume (revolutionary innocence) that the Reds released so many whites, without knowing the immediate consequences of such actions.
"At the beginning the new government treated its opponents very mildly; but it quickly learned the cost of such behaviour. The military cadets that the Bolsheviks had released on parole from the winter palace on 26th October betrayed their trust two days later and staged an uprising. Similarly mild treatment was shown to General Krasnov, which he also repaid with treason.

Victor serge, in his book year one of the Russian revolution, wrote of the events in Moscow:

“The whites surrendered at 4pm on 2 November. The committee of public safety is dissolved. The white guard surrenders its arms and is disbanded. The officers may keep the side arms that distinguish their rank. Only such weapons as are necessary for practice may be kept in the military academies... The Military Revolutionary Committee guarantees the liberty and inviolability of all. Such were the principal clauses of the armistice signed between Reds and Whites. The fighters of the counter revolution, butchers of the Kremlin, who in victory would have shown no quarter whatever to the Reds... went free”.
Serge comments:
Foolish Clemency. These very junkers, these officers, these students, these socialists of counter revolution, dispersed themselves throughout the length and breadth of Russia and there organised the civil war. The revolution was to meet them again, at Iaroslav, on the Don, at Kazan, in the Crimea in Siberia and in every conspiracy nearer home"
P30 Tony Cliff, Leon Trotsky, Sword of the Revolution, Bookmarks publishing

Production dropped in all sectors to virtually nothing, and as war and confusion and starvation reigned the Bolsheviks consolidated their domination. Post 1920 Bolsheviks brought in American, English and German manufacturers into all sectors of industry at a staggering rate which can only suggest pre-planning. After consuming Suttons Western Technology and Soviet economic development 1917-1931, it is impossible to deny soviet Russia would have been utterly destitute both technologically and financially without Anglo-American intervention.

As global markets grew and the US approached the peak of its industrialization America had an increasing concern in Russia’s internal and external markets. As bodies piled up on the pavements in the US during the ‘great’ depression, US bankers and industrialists were making a killing in early soviet Russia.

The US had an official policy of pooh poohing American-Russian financial interests in Russia but the policy was an enormous lie. The American financial establishment promoted anti communism at home but also funded it domestically and internationally. As my Portuguese compadre remarked earlier “THEY PLAY IN ALL SIDES TO GET ALWAYS VICTORIUS. No other explanation makes any discernable sense.

“With capitalism, the difference being what could be termed as the state and ‘private’ capital in this day and age, and in most times has always been very slight, in Stalin’s Russia the two were completely merged. All, if you remember, under the banner of a fight against ‘capitalism’”.

And from the point of view of the vast majority of Russians this remains the case for the entirety of post October 1917 20th century up until the present day. From the point of view of the international capitalist Russia remained a high rewards, high risk marketplace, which they had been salivating over for decades.

Take any sector of industry, just a few Sutton examines are:

Oil (dominated by US Wall Street International Barnsdall Corporation (with president named Mason Day!)) Enormous amounts of deep well mining equipment were brought in and US skilled labor dominated the vast majority of drilling sites. Also tapping for new sources of oil was again, almost exclusively undertaken by the US.

Coal mining was again dominated by UK/US interests (over 90% of foreign concessions) which again through importation of equipment and labor, provided the economic and technological impetus to kick-start Russia coal business.

Reconstruction of the metallurgical sector appears to have been balanced between the German and American interests.

33rd degree freemason Armand Hammer ( ‘Arm and Hammer’ ) ran the Allied American Corporation in Russia from 1918 in asbestos production. The hammers were a very important part of international capitalism and communism.

“Dr Julius Hammer (born in Russia in 1874, died in the United States in 1948) was a member of the steering committee which founded the Communist Party of the United States at the First National Left Wing Conference of the Socialist Party, Held in New York City in June 1919. The Hammers were then trading under license with the USSR. They continued to trade until 1923 when they operated, jointly with the soviets, The Allied American Corporation, sharing both Capital and Profits on a 50:50 basis. The secretary of the Allied American Corporation was Armand Hammer; who also managed the Alapievsky asbestos concession, while Dr. Julius Hammer, his father, was serving a term in Sing Sing for criminal abortion. Later in the 1920’s Armand Hammer operated the American Industrial Concession, for pencil factories in Moscow”. P285-286, Antony Sutton, Western technology and Soviet Economic Development 1917-1931, The Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace, 1968.

I will not continue. Any reader disputing any of these claims should examine the aforementioned works before attempting to argue, the facts concerning the connections go on forever. Where we can identify the major players such as Hammer, Thompson, Lenin, Trotsky we can with varying degrees of difficulty find the connection to freemasonry in many different guises.

[frankzappa]

Here is the 3rd Trotsky hidden hand picture, a little later than the others (1928, I think)

[frankzappa]

My apologies again, it is the 'master of the second veil' not the seventh as I stated in my last post.
Vigilantcitizen post an excellent article on the subject, please take the time to have a look.


The Hidden Hand that Shaped History
http://vigilantcitizen.com/?p=2536

[frankzappa]

Listen to the music of 'The Wicker Man' more to follow on the subject of human sacrifice.

wicker man ost/opening music/loving couples/ ruined church
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_-sHA_SQBI&NR=1

the wicker man OST-willows song
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ED5yq7lg ... re=related

the wicker man ost-corn rigs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ryg27FqW ... re=related

the wicker man OST-searching for rowan
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfS4AsbX ... re=related

[frankzappa]

"Thus in these harvest customs of modern Europe the person who cuts, binds, or threshes the last corn is treated as an embodiment of the corn spirit by being wrapped up in sheaves, killed in mimicry by agricultural implements, and thrown into the water. These coincidences with the Lityerses story seem to prove that the latter is a gnuine description of an old Phrygian harvest-custom. But since in the modern parallels the killing of the personal representative of the corn spirit is necessarily omitted or at most enacted only in mimicry, it is desirable to show that in rude society human beings have been commonly killed as an agricultural ceremony to promote the fertility of fields".

The peron who ‘binds the last corn sheaf’ is the slowest man on the production line in a factory, the person who might seem least able to keep up with all the horror that constitutes progress in modern post industrial society. Historical comparisons of working practices and their relation to human sacrifice with older times are disturbing, chiefly for they show the degree of involvement with barbarism of ‘the masses’ and also because modern parallels are overwhelming.
Modern analogies go way beyond the burning of the wicker man and such other mock sacrifice, though the example may demonstrate its symbolic meaning most clearly.

"To bend wicker, it must first be immersed in water (information) and it will become pliable through absorption.
When bent into a new shape, then dried, it will retain its configuration. If you ask most people thier opinions on religion, politics, social direction in ANY country, the people parrot what thier talking heads tell them. In Europe, victims used to be sacrified in the burning wicker man. He/She had to be 'a willing fool'. The reader may think such a person must have been rather simple, yet reflect on how your own convictions have been bent over the years" P44, The Androgynous (Hermaphroditic) Agenda, Alan Watt, available from Alan at www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com

Human sacrifice both in its ancient sense, and in a million myriad forms symbolic or otherwise, is an utterly ingrained aspect of modern everyday life. Whether they take the form of terrorist attacks, mass layoffs, genocide, ideological concepts or plain good old Masonic murders ala Jack the Ripper, the most disturbing aspect is the conclusion that this predominant religion of the masses is pagan Satanism, and that ‘the masses’ form an extremely decisive tendency within it.

The historical evidence that human sacrifice was a very widespread practice of the masses across all nations and cultures until very recent times, is overwhelming, the degree to which such practices were reverenced is also disturbing.

“The Indians of Guayaquil, in Ecuador, used to sacrifice human blood and the hearts of men when they sowed their fields. The people of Canar (now Cuenca in Ecuador) used to sacrifice a hundred children annually at harvest. The kings of Quito, the Incas of Peru, and for a long time the Spaniards were unable to suppress this bloody rite. At a Mexica harvest festival, when the first fruits of the season were offered to the sun, a criminal was placed between two immense stones, balanced opposite each other, ad was crushed by them as they fell together. His remains were buried, and a feast and dance followed. This Sacrifice was known as the meeting of the stones. We have seen that the ancient Mexicans also sacrificed human beings at all the various stages in the growth of the maize, the age of the victims corresponding to the age of the corn; for they sacrificed new born babies at sowing, older children when the grain had sprouted, and so on until it was fully ripe, when they sacrificed old men. No doubt he correspondence between the ages of the victims and the state of the corn was supposed to enhance the efficacy of the sacrifice.”

“The Pawnees annually sacrificed a human victim in spring when they sowed their fields. The Sacrifice was believed to have een enjoyned on them by the Morning Star, or by a certain bird which the Morning Star had send to them as a messenger. The bird was stuffed and preserved as a powerful talisman. They thought that the omission of this sacrifice would be followed by the total failure of the crops of maize, beans, and pumpkins. The victim was a cative of either sex. He was clad in the gayest and most costly attire, was fattened on the choicest food, and carefully kept in ignorance of his doom. When he was fat enough, they bound him to a cross in the presence of the multitude, danced a solemn dance, then cleft his head with a tomahawk and shot him with arrows. According to one trader, the squaws cut pieces of flesh from the victims body, with which they greased their hes; but this was denied by another trader who had een present at the ceremony. Immediately after the sacrifice the people preceeded to plant their fields. A particular account has been preserved of the sacrifice of a Sioux girl by the Pawnees in April 1837 or 1838. The girl was fourteen or fifteen years old and had been kept for six months and well treated. Two days before the sacrifice she was led from wigwam to wigwam, accompanied by the whole council of chiefs and warriors. At each lodge she received a small billet of wood and a little paint, which she handed to the warrior next to her. In this way she called at every wigwam, receiving at each the same present of wood and paint. On the twenty second of April she was taken out to be sacrificed, attended by the warriors, each of whom carried two pieces of wood which he had received from her hands. The body having being painted half red, half black, she was attached to a sort of gibbet and roasted for some time over a slow fire , then shot together with arrows. The chief sacrifice next tore out her heart and devoured it. While her flesh was still warm it was cut in small pieces from the bones, put in little baskets, and taken to a neighbouring corn field. There the head chief took a piece of the flesh from a basket and squeezed a drop of blood on the newly-deposited grains of corn. His example was followed by the rest till all the seed had been sprinkled with the blood; it was then covered up with earth. According to one account the body of the victim was reduced to a kind of paste, which was rubbed or sprinkled not only on the maize but also on the potatoes, the beans, and other seeds to fertilise them. By this sacrifice hoped to obtain plentiful crops”.

“A west African queen used to sacrifice a man and woman in the month of March. They were killed with spades and hoes, and their bodies buried in the middle of a field which had just been tilled. At Lagos in Guinea it was the custom annually to impale a young girl alive soon after the spring equinox in order to secure good crops. Along wither were sacrificed sheeps and goats, which with Yams, heads of maize, and plantains were hung on stakes on each side of her. The victims were bred for the purpose in the Kings seraglio, and their minds had been so powerfully wrought upon by the ftish men tht they went cheerfully to their fate. A similar sacrifice used to be annually offered at benin, in Guinea. The Marimos, a Bechuna tribe, sacrifice human being for the crops. The victim chosen is generally a short stout man. He is seized by violence or intoxicated and taken to the fields, where he is killed amongst the wheat to serve as ‘seed’ (so they phrase it). After his blood has coagulated in the sun, it is burned along with the frontal bone, the flesh attached to it, and the brain; the ashes are then scattered over the ground to fertilise it. The rest of the body is eaten”.

“The Bagobos of Mindanao, one of the Philippine Islands, offer a human sacrifice before they sow their rice. The victim is a slave, who is hewn to pieces in the forest. The atives of Bontoc in the interior of Luzon, one of the Philippine Islads, are passionate head hunters. Their principal seasons for head hunting are the times of planting and reaping of the rice. In order that the crop may turn out well, every farm must get at least one human head at planting and one at sowing. The head hunters go out in twos or threes, lie in wait for the victim, whether man or woman, cut off his or her head, hands and feet, and bring them back in haste to the village, where they are received with great rejoicings. The skulls are at first exposed on the branches of two or three dead trees which stand in an open space of every village surrounded by large stones which serve as seats. The people then dance around them and feast to get drunk. When the flesh has decayed from the head, the man who cut it off takes it home and preserves it as a relic, while his companions do the same with the hands and the feet. Similar customs are observed by the Apoyaos, another tribe in the interior of Luzon”.

“Among the Lhota Naga, one of the many savage tribes who inhabit the deep rugged labyrinthine glens which wind into the mountains from the rich valley of Brahmapootra, it used to be a common custom to chop of the heads, hands, and feet of people they met with, and then to stick up the severed extremities in their fields to ensure a good crop of grain. They bore no ill will whatsoever to the perons upon whom they had operated in this unceremonious fashion. Once they flayed boy alive, carved him in pieces, and distributed the flesh among all the villagers, who put it into corn bins to avert bad luck and ensure plentiful crops of grain. The Gonds of india, a Dravidian race, kidnapped Brahman boys, and kept them as victims to be sacrificed on various occasions. At sowing and reaping, after a triumphal procession, one of the lads was slain by being punctured with a poisoned arrow. His blood was then sprinkled over the ploughed field or the ripe crop, ad his flesh was devoured. The Oraons or Uraons of Chota Nagpur worsip a goddess called Anna Kuari, who can give good crops and make a man rich, but to induce her to do so it is necessary to offer human sacrifice. In spite of the vigilance of the British Government these sacrifices are said to be still secretly perpetrated. The victims are poor waifs and strays whose disappearance attracts no notice. April and May are the months when the catchpoles are on the prowl. At that time strangers will not go about the country alone, and parents will not let their children enter the jungle or herd the cattle. When a catchpole has found a victim, he cuts his throat and carries away the upper part of the ring finger and the nose. The goddess takes up her abode in the house of any man who has offered her a sacrifice, and from that time his fields yield a double harvest. The form she assumes in the house is that of a small child. When the householder brings in his husked rice, he takes the goddess and rolls her over the heap to double its size. But she soon grows restless and can only be pacified with the blood of fresh human victims”.

[frankzappa]

The above quotes were taken from an abridged edition of 'The Golden Bough, A Study in Magic and religion - JG Frazer' -
more to follow.

On the subject of consumption of faeces; Mark Baard has posted a short article which confirms all the assertions I made in
an earlier post. The exact same sentiment as Lenin expressed in 'The agraian question', and later by Goldsmith in 'Blueprint for survival' (their survival) is coming to fruition as we speak.

Nanny State’s next stop: your bum
2010 March 11
tags: Government, Health, News, Personal tech, Privacy, technology by Mark Baard

Whatever happened to, "I am honored to accept your waste?"

And you thought recycling was a bitch: How long before they’ve got us sorting our poop and pee, Stateside?

Toilets that catch urine and feces, separately, are catching on with do-gooders throughout Europe, according to a recent study. Told that their waste could be sorted, and converted into fertilizer (yes for food, and yes, for human consumption), they were only too happy to oblige.

Men also say they are willing squat over the bowls to pee, in order to hit their marks in the so-called “NoMix” toilets — something that’s difficult to do, standing up.

More of the disgusting story:

“NoMix-toilets have drawbacks, most importantly phosphate precipitation (20) causing blockages, or the necessity to sit to urinate (practical issues reviewed in (21)). Nevertheless, NoMix-toilets are increasingly installed.”

via High Acceptance of Urine Source Separation in Seven European Countries: A Review – Environmental Science & Technology (ACS Publications).
http://heretic.blastmagazine.com/2010/0 ... -your-bum/

[frankzappa]

There isn’t nothing going on but human sacrifice in this shitty isis temple, and perhaps the ritual of human sacrifice itself is the beginning and ending of many of the so called mysteries of freemasonry. Do you really believe this universal religion of the masses died with pre-capitalist feudalism? Alan gave an excellent quote the other night.

Lord Bertrand Russell (Ruse Sell), The scientific outlook, 1931
“Just as the sun worship of the Aztecs demanded the painful death of thousands of human beings annually so the new scientific religion will demand its holocaust of sacred victims, perhaps by means of injection, and drugs and chemicals, the population could be induced to bear whatever its scientific masters may decide to be for its own good”.
What must be stressed is that the masses are driving it (almost) as much as the elite are. The ‘community wide’ nature of pagan sacrifice, and the level of debauchery across the board is exposed in the The Khond’s or Khand’s, based in the east. They appear closest to the European tradition of burning the victim in the wicker man, but with the main difference being the Khonds tore, strangled or hacked their victims to pieces.

Who is the willing privileged simpleton and king like fool, bred for the purpose of sacrifice? It is you and I. We might carry a mobile phone, speak a load of shit from some urbanite discourse we have latched onto, and we may work in an office, university, or perhaps a radio studio, but we are no more than the shmuck in the corn field desperately threshing away, so that we may enjoy the fun of orgiastic sex and the guilty pleasures and perks of collusion with murder and barbarism, and not being the one screaming in the wicker man, or torn limb from limb (metaphorically speaking).

“The Sacrifices were offered to the earth goddess, Tari Pennu or Bera Pennu, and were believed to ensure good crops and immunity from disease and accidents. In particular, they were considered necessary in the cultivation of turmeric, the Khonds arguing that turmeric could not have a deep red color without the shedding of blood. The victim or Meriah, as he was called, was acceptable to the goddess only if he had been purchased, or had been born of victim – that is, the son of a victim’s father, or had been devoted as a child by his father or guardian. Khonds in distress often sold their children for victims, ‘considering the beatification of their souls certain, and their death, for the benefit of mankind the most honorable possible.’ The victims were often kept for years before they were sacrificed. Being regarded as consecrated beings, they were treated with extreme affection, mingled with deference, and were welcomed wherever they went. A meriah youth, on attaining maturity, was generally given a wife, who was herself usually a Meriah or victim; and with her he received a portion of land and farm-stock. Their offspring were also victims”.

“The mode of performing these tribal sacrifices was as follows. Ten or twelve day before the sacrifice, the victim was devoted by cutting off his hair, which until then, had been kept unshorn. Crowds of men and women assembled to witness the sacrifice; none might be excluded, since the sacrifice was declared to be for all mankind. It was preceeded by several days of wild revelry and gross debauchery. On the day before the sacrifice the victim, dressed in a new garment, and was led forth from the village in solemn procession, with music and dancing, to the meriah grove, aclump of high forrest trees standing a little way to the village and untouched by the axe. There they tied them to a post, which was sometimes placed between two plants of the sankissar shrub. He was then anointed with oil, ghee, and turmeric, and adorned with flowers; and a species of reverence, which it is not easy to distinguish from adoration,’ was paid to him throughout the day. A great struggle now arose to obtain the smallest relic from the person; a particle of the turmeric paste with which he was smeared, or a drop of the spittle, was esteemed of soverign virtue, especially by the women. The crowd danced round the post to music, and addressing the earth, said, ‘O God, we offer this sacrifice to you; give us good crops, seasons and health’; then speaking to the victim they said ‘We bought you with a price, and did not sieze you; now we sacrifice you according to custom, and no sin rests with us.’”

“On the last morning the orgies, which had been scarcely interrupted during the night, were resumed, and continued till noon, when they ceased, and their assembly preceded to consummate the sacrifice. The victim was again anointed with oil, and each person touched the anointed part, and wiped the oil on his own head. In some places they took the victim in procession round the village, from door to door, where some plucked hair from his head, and others begged for a drop of his spittle, with which they anointed their heads. As the victim might not be bound nor make any show of resistance, the bones of his arms and if necessary, his legs were broken; but often this precaution was rendered unnecessary by stupefying him with opium. The mode of putting his to death varied in different places. One of the commonest modes seems to have been strangulation, or squeezing to death. The branch of a green tree was cleft several feet down the middle; the victims neck (in other places, his chest) was inserted in the cleft, which the priest, aided by his assistants, strove with all his force to close. Then he wounded the victim slightly with his axe, whereupon the crowd rushed at the wretch and hewed the flesh from the bones, leaving the head and bowels untouched. Sometimes he was cut up alive. In Chinna Kimedy he was dragged along the fields, surrounded by the crowd, who, avoiding his head and intestines, hacked the flesh from the body with their knives till he died. Another very common mode of sacrifice in the same district was to fasten the victim to the proboscis of a wooden elephant, which revolved on a stout post, and as it whirled round, the crowd cut the flesh from the victim while life remained”.

“The flesh cut from the victim was instantly taken home by the persons who had been deputed by each village to bring it. To secure its rapid arrival, it was sometimes forwarded by relays of men, and conveyed with postal fleetness fifty or sixty miles. In each village all fasted rigidly until the flesh arrived. The bearer deposited it in the place of public assembly, where it was received by the priest and heads of families. The priest divided it into two portions, one of which he offered to the Earth Goddess by burying it in a hole in the ground with his back turned, and without looking. Then each man added a little earth to bury it , ad the priest covered water on the spot from a hill gourd. The other portion of flesh he divided into as many shares as there were with heads of houses present. Each head of a house rolled his shred of flesh in the leaves, and buried it in his favorite field, placing it in the earth behind his back without looking. I some places each man carried his portion of flesh in leaves, and buried it in his favorite field, placing it in the earth behind his back without looking. In some places each man carried his portion of flesh to the stream which watered his fields, and there hung it on a pole. For three days thereafter no house was swept; and in one district, strict silence was observed, no fire might e given out, no wood cut, and no strangers received. The remains of the human victims namely the head bowels and bones were watched by strong parties the night after the sacrifice; and the next morning they were burned, along with a whole sheep, on a funeral pile. The ashes were scattered over the fields, laid as paste over the houses and graneries or mixed with the new corn to preserve it from insects.”

[frankzappa]

The are many pertinent points in this broadcast. Probably the best show Alan has done with Alex.

March 17, 2010
Alan Watt on the Alex Jones Show
Infowars.com (Alex Jones' Website)
(Originally Aired Live: March 17, 2010 on Genesis Communications Network)
LISTEN / DOWNLOAD Hour 1
http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.us/a ... _Hour1.mp3
LISTEN / DOWNLOAD Hour 2
http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.us/a ... _Hour2.mp3

[frankzappa]

A horrific broadcast, essential listening.

March 26, 2010
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
God-Forsaken, We're Back to Pagan,
Primitive and Wild, Consuming the Child:
"Human Life Degraded, Throughout All Society,
Some Countries Serve Up Fetus in Culinary Variety,
As Life Becomes Cheap, There's No Shaking Fist,
While Government's After Retirees, Adding to List
Of Non-Producing Consumers, Advising Euthanasia,
Advocating Extermination Booths, It's Enough to Craze Ya,
'Are You Just Bored with Living, Miss the Wife, the Honey?'
They'll Terminate You Cheaply, Keep Your Pension Money,
For That's What it Boils Down To, Value to Your Master,
Claim They Need Your Savings, Preventing Financial Disaster,
After All, They've Got Wars to Fight, More Lands to Plunder,
Can't Have You with Nothing to Do, 'cept Appease the God of Thunder,
Yes, Mammon is Their Only God, We're Chickens in a Coop,
Side-Effect of Promiscuity, Ending Up in Soup"
***Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - March 26, 2010 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
***LISTEN / DOWNLOAD

Topics of show includes:

European Countries advertise for their Women to go for Free Abortions in Bankrupt Britain
Chinese Eating Babies for Health and Potency-Seoul Times
Charity Boss (Common Purpose) Charged With String of Violent Sexual Assaults
http://cuttingthrough.jenkness.com/CTTM ... 262010.mp3