Skip to content
Guest wrote:First of all, only successful alleged assassins get to use the 3-name moniker, unless their first and last names are the same. Thus, John WIlkes Booth, Mark David Chapman, Lee Harvey Oswald, Sirhan Sirhan. Lougher gets stuck with John Hinkley as a "failure."
Seondly, it's plainly obvious that Laughner was a victim of (not a survivor of) an MK-ULTRA-like mind control program.
And that affiliation is also apparent with the OP.
Interestingly, most such people think of themselves as the controller - Laughner certainly did. The repition and the if-then loops he went through over and over are also very indicitive.
Next comes your condescending response, which only re-enforces the possibility.
Superdog wrote:Wow, I haven't been here in a while and the place got taken over by crazies. Loughner is obviously a lunatic, probably has a mental illness.
Seer Travis Truman wrote:Superdog wrote:Wow, I haven't been here in a while and the place got taken over by crazies. Loughner is obviously a lunatic, probably has a mental illness.
Page now updated! - http://www.Truthmedia.8k.com/JaredLeeLoughner.html
Ad Hominen is not a valid argument, son.
There is no sane reason to suggest that Jared would have a mental illness based on what we thus far know.
There is no evidence that suggest that. You are just labeling Jared mentally ill in order to dismiss what he represents.
Superdog wrote:Dismiss what he represents? He represents crazy people who shoot the innocent and should be punished severely for it.
Superdog wrote:Even 6 year old girls? wtf is wrong with you
Seer Travis Truman wrote:Ad Hominen is not a valid argument, son.
Seer Travis Truman wrote:You are an idiot. Pure and simple.
Seer Travis Truman wrote:...you are an idiot.
Guest wrote:As you can see, this troll is not worth the time. It's a typical well-poisoning. Too bad this forum had to suffer with less obvious examples of this crap for years and years.
When someone comes around calling people idiots
and then wants to sling around "Ad Hominen is not a valid argument" (ad hominem is a logical fallacy, not an argument).
or if they want to tell us about the joys of murdering children, it is intensely obvious what is going on.
Debating with such a person sincerely is not only a waste of time
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest